2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2003.12.070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single-stranded DNA binding and methylation by EcoP1I DNA methyltransferase

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The enzyme showed maximal activity in the presence of Mg 2+ and Ca 2+ whereas in the presence of Mn 2+ , M.EcoP1I methylated DNA less efficiently. It has been shown that M.EcoP1I binds to DNA in the presence of various metal ions with varying affinities [6]. Our results and earlier studies suggest that M.EcoP1 harbors a metal binding center which is important for methylation.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 68%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The enzyme showed maximal activity in the presence of Mg 2+ and Ca 2+ whereas in the presence of Mn 2+ , M.EcoP1I methylated DNA less efficiently. It has been shown that M.EcoP1I binds to DNA in the presence of various metal ions with varying affinities [6]. Our results and earlier studies suggest that M.EcoP1 harbors a metal binding center which is important for methylation.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 68%
“…The 1948 bp long M.EcoP1I gene was amplified by a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using pVK1 construct [6] containing a ~2 kb long EcoP1I mod gene as a template with Phusion DNA polymerase, using the forward primer and reverse primer (Table 1). The primers were designed with the help of the annotated complete sequence of the P1 prophage by identifying the putative gene sequence of M.EcoP1I .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our surprising demonstration that CcrM binds single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) with tight affinity and specificity (Figure A,D and Table A,B,D,E) led to an effort to challenge this provocative finding. The ability of DNA MTases and other enzymes to modify ssDNA and dsDNA is not novel, although it is rarely reported, particularly for enzymes involving sequence-specific recognition. , Unfortunately, with few exceptions, the basis for claiming such dual specificities often relies on the use of large, biological DNA (e.g., viral genomes and plasmids), which can take on transient duplex structures. For CcrM, the K m ssDNA (17.22 ± 2.4 nM) and k cat (apparent, 3.9 ± 0.2 min –1 ) are similar to the values for dsDNA (Figure B), although in combination with increases in k methylation , the enzyme generally shows slightly smaller specificity constants ( k methylation / K d DNA ) for ssDNA than for the identical dsDNA sequence (Table B,C).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the endonuclease and methyltransferase sub-units are part of the same complex, with the Mod subunit providing specificity. Type III EcoPI was shown to methylate ssDNA in vitro (67). Thus, the dynamics of restriction and methylation on incoming plasmids might make conjugative entry intrinsically less susceptible to Type III restriction, similarly to filamentous, ssDNA phages which are also relatively resistant to Type III restriction (68).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%