Single-stage MPPT control realization for Aalborg inverter in photovoltaic system

Zhang, Shuai; Wu, Weimin; Wang, Houqing; Huang, Min; Gao, Ning; Blaabjerg, Frede

doi:10.1109/iecon.2017.8216726

Cited by 6 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…At the same time all of them did not find industrial application. For example, the solution [26] requires reverse-blocking IGBTs, while others are quite complex solutions.An Aalborg inverter ( Figure 1b) is proposed as an inverter that combines buck and boost functionality [30][31][32][33][34][35]. These solutions have two independent buck-boost stages that are responsible for output sinusoidal voltage generation.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Bidirectional Twisted Single-Stage Single-Phase Buck-Boost DC-AC Converter

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper describes a bidirectional twisted single-phase single-stage buck-boost dc-ac converter based on an output unfolding circuit. This solution is derived by the combination of an inverting buck-boost dc-dc converter and an unfolding circuit. The operation principle, component design guidelines, along with the control approach are presented. The zero-crossing distortion problem is discussed and solved by a simple approach. The simulation and experimental results confirm all theoretical statements. Loss distribution and achievable efficiency are analyzed. Finally, the pros and cons of the proposed solution, along with the most promising application field, are analyzed and discussed in the conclusion.Another application field of the dc-ac converter with wide input voltage regulation is battery storage. Lithium-ion batteries are targeted to become the most popular choice for on-grid and grid-off solar battery storage in the foreseeable future. Such types of batteries have a wide range of input voltage. A converter that accepts different storage elements is preferable.Several single-stage alternatives were presented as alternative solutions. Inverters with an active boost cell were described in [6][7][8][9]. These inverters provide very high boost of the input voltage but suffer from high current spikes in the semiconductors and passive elements. Impedance-source networks have been reported in many research papers as a promising single-stage solution. Z-source inverters (ZSIs) and quasi-Z-source inverters (qZSIs) were proposed for different applications. Existing solutions were reviewed in [10][11][12][13][14], and different relevant issues are addressed in [15][16][17][18][19][20]. However, recent research revealed evident drawbacks of the IS-based converters in terms of power density and efficiency [21][22][23].Split-source inverters (SPIs) [24,25] were proposed as another alternative solution. According to the literature, SPIs have less passive component counts accompanied by higher voltage and current stresses at lower voltage gains, and they do not have short circuit immunity.Several interesting single-stage buck-boost inverters were proposed in [26][27][28][29]. At the same time all of them did not find industrial application. For example, the solution [26] requires reverse-blocking IGBTs, while others are quite complex solutions.An Aalborg inverter ( Figure 1b) is proposed as an inverter that combines buck and boost functionality [30][31][32][33][34][35]. These solutions have two independent buck-boost stages that are responsible for output sinusoidal voltage generation. The main advantage of the proposed solution is in the minimum voltage drop of the filtering inductors in the power loop at any time. At the same time, this solution uses a double number of semiconductors and an inductor in the buck and boost stage, which is an obvious drawback. Another drawback consists in the two power sources utilization. A similar idea with double components is discussed in [36].The solution based on the input boost a...

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%