1970
DOI: 10.1007/bf01975414
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single specimen determination of Young's and bulk moduli of polymers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1972
1972
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Contrary to the suggestions given by Warfield et al (1970) to determine both E and K consecutively on the same specimen (this being possible when E and K are of the same order of magnitude), two sets of eight samples of alginate gels were produced. One set was tested in compression without the constraining ring using a 100 N load cell at V t = 0.5 mm s À1 to obtain the Young's modulus ( Table 2).…”
Section: Nol Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Contrary to the suggestions given by Warfield et al (1970) to determine both E and K consecutively on the same specimen (this being possible when E and K are of the same order of magnitude), two sets of eight samples of alginate gels were produced. One set was tested in compression without the constraining ring using a 100 N load cell at V t = 0.5 mm s À1 to obtain the Young's modulus ( Table 2).…”
Section: Nol Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the NOL test (Chabrier et al, 1999;Warfield et al, 1970), which is a uniaxial compression test, the force required to deform the specimen is initially proportional to the Young's modulus (E). As soon as the deformed specimen contacts the constraining ring, there is an instantaneous change in slope, this being proportional to the bulk modulus (K).…”
Section: Nol Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Contrary to the suggestions given by Warfield et al. (1970) to consecutively determine both E and K on the same specimen, two sets of 25 specimens of bologna were produced.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The test developed by Warfield et al (1970) at the U.S. Naval Ordnance Laboratory (White Oak, MD), and generally referred as the "NOL Test" (Chabrier et al 1999), was used.…”
Section: Mechanical Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%