2020
DOI: 10.1109/taes.2019.2895709
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single Space Based Sensor Bias Estimation Using a Single Target of Opportunity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it needs to measure the relative distance between neighboring sensors to provide mutual observation information, which increases the sensor burden. The literature [7] proposes a method for spatial registration of a single sensor using batch nonlinear least squares estimation, which is shown to be statistically valid by the evaluation of the Clamero lower bound, but the method requires high-precision satellite coordinates of the sensor. Lu Z. and Zhu M. et al [8] proposed an iterative design spatial registration algorithm based on expectation maximization (EM), but the model is too ideal and far from engineering applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it needs to measure the relative distance between neighboring sensors to provide mutual observation information, which increases the sensor burden. The literature [7] proposes a method for spatial registration of a single sensor using batch nonlinear least squares estimation, which is shown to be statistically valid by the evaluation of the Clamero lower bound, but the method requires high-precision satellite coordinates of the sensor. Lu Z. and Zhu M. et al [8] proposed an iterative design spatial registration algorithm based on expectation maximization (EM), but the model is too ideal and far from engineering applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Possible sources of bias include sensor alignment bias, sensor altitude bias, location bias, etc. [17]. In this work, we consider only the measurement biases, i.e., the biases in the elevation and bearing angles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple factors in various applications lead to the appearance of gross errors. Examples include miscalibrations of sensors, other configuration aberrations like errors in sensor location or alignment, clock errors, or malfunctioning [11]. In addition, environmental inconsistencies can introduce biases in observations e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%