1998
DOI: 10.1097/00010694-199808000-00005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single-Source Gamma Radiation Procedures for Improved Calibration and Measurements in Porous Media

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The image analysis represents a non-invasive and cost-effective procedure to reproduce the saturation profile under dynamic condition. Generally, the non-intrusive or nondestructive methods used to measure fluid saturation, such as gamma ray [2,3,13,21], or conventional X-ray attenuation techniques [22][23][24], do not allow the acquisition of dynamic fluid saturation distribution in the entire flow domain at one time. Because of practical limitations on source intensity, long counting times are needed and only one point can be measured at one time [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The image analysis represents a non-invasive and cost-effective procedure to reproduce the saturation profile under dynamic condition. Generally, the non-intrusive or nondestructive methods used to measure fluid saturation, such as gamma ray [2,3,13,21], or conventional X-ray attenuation techniques [22][23][24], do not allow the acquisition of dynamic fluid saturation distribution in the entire flow domain at one time. Because of practical limitations on source intensity, long counting times are needed and only one point can be measured at one time [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hydraulic conductivity was obtained using a constant head method described by Wietsma et al (2009). The retention parameters were obtained by fitting the van Genuchten (1980) saturationpressure head equation to saturation data obtained using a dual-energy gamma system (Oostrom et al 1998), after draining an initially saturated 1-m-long column. The average porosity and dry bulk density values listed in Table 1 were obtained gravimetrically.…”
Section: Flow Cell Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indirect methods for determining Ijo are necessary for columns and cells packed under saturated conditions and are provided by Oostrom et al (1998). A drawback of dry packing is the possibility of cracking, settling, or consolidation of the porous medium, which affects the bulk density values.…”
Section: Imaging Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The traditional dual-source calibration method is described by Oostrom et al (1995) and Stillwater and Klute (1988). A new single-source is described by Oostrom et al (1998); it has distinct advantages over the dual-source method. It is simpler and more accurate than the traditional dual-source method, and is recommended as a standard procedure in experiments.…”
Section: Imaging Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%