Single‐site employment (multiple jobholding) in residential aged care: A response to COVID‐19 with wider workforce lessons

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to capture stakeholder views and issues arising from the implementation of the innovative single-site employment guiding principles (SSE-GP) that the Australian Government, in consultation with the sector, introduced into hot spot residential aged care facilities (RACFs) in July 2020 in response to COVID-19.Methods: Interviews with 74 stakeholders around Australia were conducted in October-November 2020. Provider interviews included employees and managerial and human resources staff in profit and non-profit services who did, and did not, have COVID-19 outbreaks. Sector interviews included representatives from peak bodies, unions, government, academics, advocates, labour hire and registered training organisations.Results: There was broad but not total agreement on SSE-GP's effectiveness.Beyond specific SSE-GP feedback, six strategic workforce issues were identified.The quality of resident care was mixed, sometimes improved and sometimes diminished. The extent of employees' multiple jobholding surprised many providers, and rostering and unplanned absenteeism are a substantial strain for both providers and employees. Innovative work practices are often difficult for smaller providers lacking employment relations specialists. Future SSE-GP is seen by larger providers as voluntary and organisation-rather than facility-specific, and unions saw only mandated SSE-GP as appropriate for future outbreaks. Last, all staff, management and executives had additional stress that placed their well-being at risk. Conclusions:Although SSE-GP revealed new and existing weaknesses in the Australian RACF workforce, the broad industry consultation and collaboration demonstrated that the sector can meet COVID-19's urgent and complex challenges. The experience provided lessons for further workforce challenges that remain to be addressed.

Practical infection control training for Victoria’s aged care workforce at the time of COVID-19 pandemic: a community case study

“…The broad and diverse aged care workforce also includes auxiliary workers who may not have substantial infection control training; and as the outbreak progressed, there were surge workforce staff who may have been new to aged care. The delivery of care in RACFs is 24 h, 7 days a week and many workers concurrently worked in two or more RACFs ( 34 ).…”

The 2020 Aged Care Workforce Census and Issues Arising for Residential Care Workforce Planning and Policy

“…With the majority of part-time casual/ contract workers on provider payrolls, management action to address under-employment offers a ready first step to workforce growth. Jepsen and Barker (2022) have, however, reported divergent views among providers: some claimed that casual staff are needed for flexibility while others pointed to the stability of resident populations and their care needs requiring a stable workforce. Investigation of variations in levels of casual and part-time employment between providers, taking account of management views as well as objective factors such as location, scale and sector, could identify options for optimising the current workforce ahead of new recruitment.…”

The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on People With Cognitive Impairment Residing in Aged Care Facilities: An Integrative Review

“…12,15 More stand-alone buildings and compartmentalized staffing zones are associated with lower COVID-19 prevalence. 12 Workforce factors associated with higher prevalence include staff working across facilities or sites, 9,12,14,16 and facilities employing nursing home agency staff (who are more likely to work across sites). 9 Fewer staff and high resident-staff ratios are associated with higher COVID-19 prevalence.…”