2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-16307-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single-Sided NMR

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent decades, there has been a concerted effort to develop more accessible, portable MR sensors [18,19]. Although fundamentally based on the same phenomena, conventional MRI and portable MR methods differ in many ways including the instrumentation employed, the information provided, and the applications targeted.…”
Section: Open Access Edited Bymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent decades, there has been a concerted effort to develop more accessible, portable MR sensors [18,19]. Although fundamentally based on the same phenomena, conventional MRI and portable MR methods differ in many ways including the instrumentation employed, the information provided, and the applications targeted.…”
Section: Open Access Edited Bymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 The calculation is based on obtaining a numerical solution to the Bloch equations for arbitrary values of B 0 and B 1 and for an arbitrary pulse excitation shape. Using the approximation of short (with respect to the transverse relaxation time) rectangular excitation pulses, a very efficient solution to the Bloch equations, eg, resulting from the method reported by Casanova and Perlo, 24 can be obtained. Here, we set the frequency of the excitation pulses to be equal to the average value of γB 0 in the ROI (γ is the electro-geomagnetic ratio).…”
Section: Predicted Esr-sensitive Volumementioning
confidence: 99%
“…referred to as the 2.28 MHz magnet hereafter, is a 18 × 11 × 7 cm, 0.05 T unilateral permanent magnet with a homogeneous sweet spot 2.5 cm off the magnet surface (Garcia-Naranjo, Guo, Marica, Liao, & Balcom, 2014;Marble, Mastikhin, Colpitts, & Balcom, 2007). A ω o /2π = 2.28 MHz homebuilt surface coil designed for the 0.05 T magnet allows the sweet spots of the rf and static magnetic fields to coincide 2.5 cm above the magnet surface (Casanova, Perlo, & Blumich, 2011). The final sensor, which will be referred to as the 19.5 MHz magnet hereafter, is a 10 × 11 × 5 cm, 0.46 T permanent magnet equipped with a flat rf surface coil that is tuned and matched to ω o /2π = 19.5 MHz and a sweet spot standoff of 4 mm.…”
Section: Food Engineering Materials Science and Nanotechnologymentioning
confidence: 99%