2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00383-016-3956-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single scrotal incision orchiopexy versus the inguinal approach in children with palpable undescended testis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract: SO is a safe and effective surgical approach alternative to IO for pediatric UDTs. Compared with IO, SO has the advantage of shorter operative times. Besides, the incidence of postoperative wound infection may be slightly lower in SO. We suggest that SO should be considered as an acceptable option for children with UDTs.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
32
0
4

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
32
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…So far, testicular atrophy has not been found in 773 patients in this group. Secondly, open surgery requires separate the inguinal canal, which not only destroys the anatomical structure of the inguinal canal, but also needs to cut the intra-abdominal oblique muscle and the transverse abdominis muscle at the inner ring for a higher position of the inguinal typical cryptorchidism, which would be prone to occur wound infection, bleeding, and even testicular retraction; according to the literature, the wound infection rate of open inguinal orchiopexy is 1.9-2.5% [2,10]. At last, the most important is trans-inguinal orchiopexy unable to detect a contralateral occult hernia or patent processus vaginalis, cryptorchidism associate with a contralateral patent processus reach up to 33-40% [7,9], while preoperative color Doppler ultrasound examination only discovers about 20% [11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far, testicular atrophy has not been found in 773 patients in this group. Secondly, open surgery requires separate the inguinal canal, which not only destroys the anatomical structure of the inguinal canal, but also needs to cut the intra-abdominal oblique muscle and the transverse abdominis muscle at the inner ring for a higher position of the inguinal typical cryptorchidism, which would be prone to occur wound infection, bleeding, and even testicular retraction; according to the literature, the wound infection rate of open inguinal orchiopexy is 1.9-2.5% [2,10]. At last, the most important is trans-inguinal orchiopexy unable to detect a contralateral occult hernia or patent processus vaginalis, cryptorchidism associate with a contralateral patent processus reach up to 33-40% [7,9], while preoperative color Doppler ultrasound examination only discovers about 20% [11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zudem kann der Eingriff in einer deutlich kürzeren Operationszeit durchgeführt werden. In dem systematischen Review und der Meta-Analyse von Feng et al aus 2016 erfolgte die Operation über den skrotalen Zugang zwischen 8 und 14 Minuten schneller als mittels der inguinalen Inzision [5]. Aufgrund der fehlenden inguinalen Inzision mit einem Zugang über die gefältelte Skrotalhaut zeigen sich außerdem weniger Narben mit einem deutlich verbesserten kosmetischen Ergebnis [6].…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Auch bezüglich der Inzidenz von Hernien oder Hydrozelen fand sich kein signifikanter Unterschied. Abschließend fassten die Autoren zusammen, dass es sich bei der skrotalen Orchidofunikolyse somit um ein geeignetes, sicheres und effizientes Verfahren im Vergleich zur inguinalen Inzision bei deutlich verkürzter Operationszeit mit geringer Morbidität handelt [5].…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…So far, testicular atrophy has not been found in 773 patients in this group. Secondly, open surgery requires separate the inguinal canal, which not only destroys the anatomical structure of the inguinal canal, but also needs to cut the intra-abdominal oblique muscle and the transverse abdominis muscle at the inner ring for a higher position of the inguinal typical cryptorchidism, which would be prone to occur wound infection, bleeding, and even testicular retraction; according to the literature, the wound infection rate of open inguinal orchiopexy is 1.9%-2.5% [2,10].At last, the most important is trans-inguinal orchiopexy unable to detect a contralateral occult hernia or patent processus vaginalis, cryptorchidism associate with a contralateral patent processus reach up to 33%-40% [7,9], while preoperative color Doppler ultrasound examination only discovers about 20% [11]. A prospective study in Japan indicated that the diameter of the contralateral processus vaginalis can be developed into symptomatic inguinal hernia with a diameter of >2 mm, with specificity and sensitivity of 81.8% and 71.3%, respectively [12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%