2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2020.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single position circumferential fusion improves operative efficiency, reduces complications and length of stay compared with traditional circumferential fusion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
43
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
43
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Time under general anesthesia may contribute to increased rates of post-operative ileus and prolonged hospitalization in patients who undergo DP LLIF. 14 In the current study, there were no mal-positioned screws following posterior instrumentation with the patient placed in the lateral decubitus position. While SP LLIF using traditional techniques is considered safe, the rates of screw malposition and pedicle breach has been reported to be as high as 5%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Time under general anesthesia may contribute to increased rates of post-operative ileus and prolonged hospitalization in patients who undergo DP LLIF. 14 In the current study, there were no mal-positioned screws following posterior instrumentation with the patient placed in the lateral decubitus position. While SP LLIF using traditional techniques is considered safe, the rates of screw malposition and pedicle breach has been reported to be as high as 5%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…In terms of blood loss, the current study results were comparable to reports in the literature following SP circumferential fusion which did not use a robotic arm for posterior pedicle screw instrumentation. 14,[19][20][21] Prone positioning may increase intra-abdominal pressure which can contribute to higher blood loss when using DP techniques. Multiple studies have reported blood loss to be a risk factor for increased length of stay.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Traditionally, after the interbody device is placed in LLIF and OLIF procedures in the lateral position, the patient is "flipped" to the prone position for pedicle screw instrumentation and posterior stabilization. Recent studies have begun to investigate the placement of posterior instrumentation in the lateral position, to avoid the "flip," and initial studies have demonstrated improved operative efficiency, less blood loss, and less postoperative ileus with single position lateral circumferential fusions [56].…”
Section: Robotic-assisted Lateral and Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusionmentioning
confidence: 99%