2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2021.203689
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single-point scratch testing for understanding particle engagement in abrasion of multiphase materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(53 reference statements)
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, 99.9% of the groove surface transferred to the pile-up, which means that 0.07% corresponded to a loss of material. In accordance with Rajendhran et al [ 57 ], this could be due to the micro-ploughing mechanism, which represents the steady-state formation of a groove that has ridges on both sides formed by local plastic deformation without the formation of wear debris because the percentage of material loss is almost negligible. The area of the groove surface of Ti-6Al-4V was close to 71.8%, and the pile-up area 27.9%.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, 99.9% of the groove surface transferred to the pile-up, which means that 0.07% corresponded to a loss of material. In accordance with Rajendhran et al [ 57 ], this could be due to the micro-ploughing mechanism, which represents the steady-state formation of a groove that has ridges on both sides formed by local plastic deformation without the formation of wear debris because the percentage of material loss is almost negligible. The area of the groove surface of Ti-6Al-4V was close to 71.8%, and the pile-up area 27.9%.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…As reported by Rajendhran et al [ 57 ], wear in terms of scratch width and depth are the possible means to measure the damage assessment. In most cases, the scratch width is estimated to control the wear.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After each test, the surface was thoroughly cleaned in acetone by ultrasonic cleaning (b-sonic, NLPURE, NL) for 10 mins. The procedure for testing the mechanical properties has been explained in detail [41]. The mass measurements of the samples were performed using an electronic balance (AX223E, Ohaus Corporation, USA) with an accuracy of ± 0.1 mg.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, employing a test able to provide strength of interparticle bonds in the shallow surface would be more desirable in crust abrasion studies. The scratch test is a tribological technique that simulates the wear process and provides abrasion characteristics of the materials under controlled conditions (Rajendhran et al, 2021; Vencl et al, 2010). In the scratch test, a pin scratches the intended surface, and the normal and tangential forces applied on the pin are measured continuously during scratching.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%