2003
DOI: 10.1016/s1350-4495(03)00165-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single-pixel polarimeter: dielectric-gratings model and fabrication progress

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 Figure 1 shows the fraction of incident light absorbed in the four quantum-well stacks versus the angle of linearly polarized incident light. These curves demonstrate that the relative photocurrents from the four quantum-well stacks provide a means to measure the polarization of incident light.…”
Section: Polarization Detection Within a Single Pixelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Figure 1 shows the fraction of incident light absorbed in the four quantum-well stacks versus the angle of linearly polarized incident light. These curves demonstrate that the relative photocurrents from the four quantum-well stacks provide a means to measure the polarization of incident light.…”
Section: Polarization Detection Within a Single Pixelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The gratings can be metal-semiconductor 5 or dielectric-semiconductor. 7,14 The pixel- Figure 1. A side-by-side comparison of the error in determining the normalized Stokes parameters for a grating spectrometer using an FPA with all identical QWISPP pixels versus an FTIR spectrometer using an FPA with randomly varying QWISPP pixels.…”
Section: The Qwispp Pixelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One can further decrease the error compared to the results of this paper by letting N R > 4 and designing the structure with a grating material that allows more light to penetrate to the deepest layers of the device. 14 The matrix M will be called the device's polarization response matrix, and in our model, M depends on more than 17 parameters including the structure of the pixel, the wavelength of the incident light, and the incidence angle of the incident light. The dependence on all these parameters is suppressed for simplicity.…”
Section: The Qwispp Pixelmentioning
confidence: 99%