2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2011.12.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single phase cooling of large surfaces with square arrays of impinging water sprays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Chen et al [5,6] reported that droplet velocity 53 had the most dominant effect on critical heat flux (CHF), followed by 54 the droplet flux, while Sauter mean diameter showed little effect. In 55 the investigation of single phase cooling of large surfaces using square 56 arrays of water sprays, Pereira et al [7] found that coolant mass flux 57 had a strong effect on the single phase heat transfer, while droplet 58 Sauter mean diameter and nozzles discharge velocity had secondary 59 effects. Lin [8] used eight miniature nozzles to conduct the spray cooling 60 and reported that CHF increased as the volumetric flux or pressure drop 61 was increased.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chen et al [5,6] reported that droplet velocity 53 had the most dominant effect on critical heat flux (CHF), followed by 54 the droplet flux, while Sauter mean diameter showed little effect. In 55 the investigation of single phase cooling of large surfaces using square 56 arrays of water sprays, Pereira et al [7] found that coolant mass flux 57 had a strong effect on the single phase heat transfer, while droplet 58 Sauter mean diameter and nozzles discharge velocity had secondary 59 effects. Lin [8] used eight miniature nozzles to conduct the spray cooling 60 and reported that CHF increased as the volumetric flux or pressure drop 61 was increased.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This metallic part was mounted inside a polypropylene box thermally insulated with glass wool. Numerical simulations [9] of heat diffusion in the setup, obtained during the test chamber design phase, revealed that, fundamentally, all of the heat would be dissipated through the surface exposed to spray impingement. An outer Plexiglas box, to which a nozzle support plate was mounted, allowed for visual observation of the impingement pattern and spent water collection.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Information on multiple, overlapping or not, spray nozzle arrangements still is scarce [5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. As in the case of jet arrays, multiple spray nozzles must be positioned in some repetitive pattern if impingement flow heat transfer enhancement is to be extended to the processing of large surface products.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations