Single-Particle Levels of Nonspherical Nuclei In The Region<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mn>150</mml:mn><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn /><mml:mn>190</mml:mn><mml:mn /></mml:math>

Ogle, W.; Wahlborn, S.; Piepenbring, R.; Fredriksson, Sverker

doi:10.1103/revmodphys.43.424

Cited by 151 publications

(33 citation statements)

References 132 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Any significant amount of K-forbiddeness would then increase logft to values much higher than the observed 6.2. Comparison of systematics of Nilsson orbits in adjacent odd-A nuclei [19] shows that no 3 + state is expected below 200 keV excitation energy except members of bands based on lower spin states. The p[541] ~, states show a very strong Coriolis coupling in this mass region [20,21] for the ground state of lVSRe.…”

Section: Beta Transition Probabilitiesmentioning

confidence: 97%

The decay of174Ta

Cardoso¹,

Klieb²,

Goudsmit³

et al. 1975

Z Physik A

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. Levels in t74Hf excited in the decay of ~V4Ta have been studied. Measurements of gamma-rays, conversion electrons and gamma-gamma-time coincidences were performed. The ground state band, the beta-vibrational band, the gamma-vibrational band with its head at 1226.81keV, a K=3 + band at 1303.42keV and a K=2-octupole band at 1308.67 keV were observed. Several 2 + levels with K -0 are excited. The main fl+-branches proceed through allowed or first-forbidden transitions to the 2 + and 4 + levels of the ground state band. The character of the I" = 3 ~ +) ground state of 174Ta is discussed. E Radioactivity 174Ta I-from 175Lu(3He, 4n)

show abstract

Section: Beta Transition Probabilitiesmentioning

confidence: 97%

The decay of174Ta

Cardoso¹,

Klieb²,

Goudsmit³

et al. 1975

Z Physik A

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This is much less than the value of ~ 6 expected for a spherical hll/z hole state but is consistent with the predictions of the Nilsson and rotation-vibrational models with Coriolis coupling effects included (see Table 3). Thus, neglecting any hindrance to the transition strength due to shape changes between the target and final nuclei, the present (t,c 0 results show that the 80keV level is not a spherical h11/2 con- orbital [33]. In the present rotation-vibration calculation the zero-point rotational energy was taken into account and the energy of the 11/2-[505] bandhead was reproduced very well.…”

Section: The 11/2-[505] Bandmentioning

confidence: 66%

Proton states in193Ir and195Ir populated via the (?) reaction

1978

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The nuclear structures of 193Ir and 195Ir have been studied using the 194pt(t,~) and 196pt(t, c0 reactions. Levels up to ~2MeV in excitation energy were studied with a resolution of ~ 13 keV (FWHM) and spectroscopic strengths were extracted. The lowlying states in 193Ir have been interpreted in terms of both the Nilsson and the rotationvibration models including Coriolis, particle-vibration and rotation-vibrational coupl- . Surprisingly, there was no significant difference between the stripping and pick-up strengths for the low-lying states in 193Ir, suggesting that the equilibrium nuclear shape of 193Ir has large overlaps with the shapes of both 192Os and 194pt. The nuclear level structure of 195Ir appears to be similar to those of the lighter iridium isotopes.

show abstract

“…The three-quasiparticle character of this state is therefore questionable, as is the case for the level at 1,792keV which is fed by a beta branch with log jr=5.5. Also, the [523],L neutron orbit is not expected [12] close to the Fermi level in this nucleus. The level at 515.47 keV in ~65Ho has been extensively discussed by Bunker and Reich [11].…”

Section: Fast Transitions To Three-quasiparticle Levelsmentioning

confidence: 97%

“…This cannot be due to experimental inaccuracies, unless these are grossly underestimated. The estimated uncertainties in the single particle and Fermi level energies [12] do not cause large errors in the pairing reduction factors and the magnitude of the pairing gap parameter is unimportant. The effect of blocking, which has not been taken into account, is probably largely reduced by the non-conservation of particle number in the BCS approximation.…”

Section: Allowed Unhindered Transitionsmentioning

confidence: 98%