1995
DOI: 10.1080/02786829508965311
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single Particle Characterization by Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry

Abstract: We have built a particle analyzer capable of real-time detection and characterization of individual particles. Particle analysis is accomplished by pulsed laser ablation of a particle followed by time-of-fiight mass spectrometry of the resulting atomic and molecular ions. The detected ions are characteristic of a particle's

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
54
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(7 reference statements)
0
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These properties are crucial to model the climate effects of particles. Further, by collecting characteristic mass spectra for a variety of primary (i.e., directly emitted) aerosol sources, both of anthropogenic and biogenic origin, the technique can be applied for source-apportionment studies (Bhave et al 2001).In recent years, a number of instruments for on-line singleparticle analysis have been developed (Johnston and Wexler 1995;Weiss et al 1996;Reents et al 1995;Hinz et al 1996;Murphy et al 1997;Gard et al 1997;Reilly et al 1997;Hunt and Petrucci 2002;Thomson et al 2000). These instruments are similar in their concept, combining an aerosol inlet, a particlesizing technique, a particle-desorption/ionization technique, and subsequent mass spectrometric detection of the ions produced.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These properties are crucial to model the climate effects of particles. Further, by collecting characteristic mass spectra for a variety of primary (i.e., directly emitted) aerosol sources, both of anthropogenic and biogenic origin, the technique can be applied for source-apportionment studies (Bhave et al 2001).In recent years, a number of instruments for on-line singleparticle analysis have been developed (Johnston and Wexler 1995;Weiss et al 1996;Reents et al 1995;Hinz et al 1996;Murphy et al 1997;Gard et al 1997;Reilly et al 1997;Hunt and Petrucci 2002;Thomson et al 2000). These instruments are similar in their concept, combining an aerosol inlet, a particlesizing technique, a particle-desorption/ionization technique, and subsequent mass spectrometric detection of the ions produced.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This potential is shown in on-line aerosol analysis, where laser desorption/ionization has been used to detect particles that are smaller than optical detection allows, i.e., d < 100 nm (Reents et al, 1995;Carson, Johnston, & Wexler, 1997;Reents & Ge, 2000;Kane, Oktem, & Johnston, 2001;Reents & Schabel, 2001). In contrast to the LIF as illustrated in this article, no fluorescent labeling is required and, furthermore, masses of the resulting product ions can be identified with this technique.…”
Section: Conclusion and Outlooksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others measure the ight time between two laser beams (Prather et al 1994;Yang et al 1996) or between two focal points of one laser beam (Weiss et al 1997) and correlate this measured velocity to the particle's aerodynamic diameter, d a (aerodynamic particle sizing). Another quite different approach involves preselecting a certain particle size for introduction into the instrument and chemically analyzing particles of just one size at a time (Reents et al 1995;Ge et al 1998). This method has the advantage of allowing for analysis of ultra ne (<100 nm) particles as small as 2 nm but the obvious disadvantage of missing most particles in a polydisperse sample at a given time, as only one narrow size slice can be analyzed at a given time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%