2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.vlsi.2010.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single-pair bulk-driven CMOS input stage: A compact low-voltage analog cell for scaled technologies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, the linearity of the proposed amplifier is lower than that of the telescopic amplifier in the different output voltage swings. However, as mentioned before, using bulk amplification instead of the gate amplification in PFB improves the linearity of PFB and amplifier because of the higher linearity of the bulk amplification [6,7,[9][10][11]. Hence, in the same power consumption and output voltage swing, the linearity of proposed amplifier is better than that of the amplifier reported in [5], because in [5], gate-driven differential pairs are used in PFB structure which has lower linearity in comparison with bulk-driven differential pair.…”
Section: Linearity Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the linearity of the proposed amplifier is lower than that of the telescopic amplifier in the different output voltage swings. However, as mentioned before, using bulk amplification instead of the gate amplification in PFB improves the linearity of PFB and amplifier because of the higher linearity of the bulk amplification [6,7,[9][10][11]. Hence, in the same power consumption and output voltage swing, the linearity of proposed amplifier is better than that of the amplifier reported in [5], because in [5], gate-driven differential pairs are used in PFB structure which has lower linearity in comparison with bulk-driven differential pair.…”
Section: Linearity Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to obtain precise gain and phase characteristics at high frequencies, the non-dominant poles p 2 and p 3 , as well as both zeros of the transfer function (18) have to be located at much higher frequencies than f o (note that the RHP zero appears at a lower frequency than the left half-plane (LHP) one). In order to have poles p 2 and p 3 in LHP for integrator stability, the condition g 3 > > g 2 must always be satisfied.…”
Section: Frequency Compensationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The transfer function of the circuit of Figure 7(a), from each differential input to its output is described by equation (18). Since parasitic poles and zeros are located at much higher frequencies than the unitygain frequency f o , then the lossy integrator of Figure 7(b) is stable with a large stability margin.…”
Section: Multiple Input and Lossy Integratorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using bulk-driven transistors [15,16], flipped voltage follower cell [17], pseudo-differential pairs [18], floating gate approach, sub-threshold MOSFET [16], and level shifter are some design methods reported for reduced supply voltage analog circuits. Although these techniques ruin most of the OTAs characteristics, such as noise, linearity, open loop DC gain, unity gain bandwidth, and common mode rejection ratio, merging these methods is necessary for ultra low voltage designs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%