1987
DOI: 10.1007/bf02455992
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single oral dose pharmacokinetics of tiapride in patients with Huntington's disease

Abstract: The pharmacokinetic properties of a single oral dose of 100 mg of tiapride were studied in six patients with Huntington's disease. The results for five patients were consistent with a two compartment open model. Peak plasma concentrations were observed within 2 h following drug administration with a mean value of 0.92 micrograms/ml being recorded. The drug was rapidly eliminated as unmetabolised tiapride in the urine, 51% of the dose was recovered in 24 h. The plasma elimination half-life was 5.3 h and the ave… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Immediately after this session, the dopaminergic antagonist tiapride was administered orally in a single dose of 100 mg. Control participants received an identical-looking placebo. One hundred and twenty minutes after administration of the drug/placebo, in accordance with the pharmacokinetic profile of tiapride with peak plasma concentrations achieved around this time point (Rey et al, 1982 ; Norman et al, 1987 ), the second fMRI session was performed, which comprised the extinction learning phase and the extinction recall phase. Tiapride is a selective antagonist of D2 and D3 dopamine receptors (Dose and Lange, 2000 ), which has previously been shown to impair motor learning in humans (Lissek et al, 2014 ), as well as taste (Mediavilla et al, 2012 ) and place (Hurtado et al, 2014 ) aversion learning in rats.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Immediately after this session, the dopaminergic antagonist tiapride was administered orally in a single dose of 100 mg. Control participants received an identical-looking placebo. One hundred and twenty minutes after administration of the drug/placebo, in accordance with the pharmacokinetic profile of tiapride with peak plasma concentrations achieved around this time point (Rey et al, 1982 ; Norman et al, 1987 ), the second fMRI session was performed, which comprised the extinction learning phase and the extinction recall phase. Tiapride is a selective antagonist of D2 and D3 dopamine receptors (Dose and Lange, 2000 ), which has previously been shown to impair motor learning in humans (Lissek et al, 2014 ), as well as taste (Mediavilla et al, 2012 ) and place (Hurtado et al, 2014 ) aversion learning in rats.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There was very little difference in tiapride elimination parameters between volunteers and patients (table III), with the exception of a decreased percentage of :he dose eliminated in urine in the patient groups and a prolonged elimination halflife (t'l2,3) in the study of Norman et al (1987). These latter investigators ascribed this to the mean age of the patient group being about double that of the volunteers in other studies, and possibly as a result of the disease process.…”
Section: Eliminationmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The methods used for measuring concentrations of tiapride and its metabolites in body fluids include gas chromatography (Kamizono et al 1991), high performance liquid chromatography (Norman et al 1986(Norman et al , 1987Rey et al 1982a, b) and radioactivity from [3H]tiapride as measured by liquid scintillation (Strolin-Benedetti et al 1978).…”
Section: Pharmacokinetic Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, participants assigned to the experimental group received a single oral dose of 100 mg of the DA-antagonist tiapride, while participants assigned to the control group received an identical-looking placebo. 2 h after administration of the drug/placebo, in accordance with the pharmacokinetic profile of tiapride with peak plasma concentration achieved around this time point (Rey et al, 1982; Norman et al, 1987), the experimental procedure started with the pre-training assessment of CE, followed by training and performance of the motor sequence task in the MRI scanner. Afterwards, CE post-training was assessed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%