2015
DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.3453
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single-nucleotide-resolution mapping of m6A and m6Am throughout the transcriptome

Abstract: N6-methyladenosine (m6A) is the most abundant modified base in eukaryotic mRNA and has been linked to diverse effects on mRNA fate. Current m6A mapping approaches localize m6A residues to 100–200 nt-long regions of transcripts. The precise position of m6A in mRNAs cannot be identified on a transcriptome-wide level because there are no chemical methods to distinguish between m6A and adenosine. Here we show that anti-m6A antibodies can induce specific mutational signatures at m6A residues after ultraviolet light… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

54
1,444
2
7

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,196 publications
(1,507 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
54
1,444
2
7
Order By: Relevance
“…While this manuscript was in preparation, data from Jaffrey and colleagues was published showing that FTO does not specifically demethylate m 6 A RNA, but instead prefers to demethylate m 6 A m (48 6 A relied on an antibody against m 6 A, but this antibody was shown to detect both m 6 A and m 6 A m (49). In addition, while the approach we used for m 6 A-seq did not provide us with the precise locations of demethylated adenosines in RNA from Gsk-3 DKO ESCs, we nonetheless observed hundreds of mRNAs had regions largely devoid of methylated adenosines.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While this manuscript was in preparation, data from Jaffrey and colleagues was published showing that FTO does not specifically demethylate m 6 A RNA, but instead prefers to demethylate m 6 A m (48 6 A relied on an antibody against m 6 A, but this antibody was shown to detect both m 6 A and m 6 A m (49). In addition, while the approach we used for m 6 A-seq did not provide us with the precise locations of demethylated adenosines in RNA from Gsk-3 DKO ESCs, we nonetheless observed hundreds of mRNAs had regions largely devoid of methylated adenosines.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6B) are both reduced by approximately 40% with respect to input mRNA in Gsk-3 DKO ESCs, providing independent validation of our m 6 A-seq results. Our approach for detecting m 6 A relied on an antibody against m 6 A, but this antibody was recently shown to detect both m 6 A and N 6 , 2'-Odimethyladenosine (m 6 A m ) (48), making it impossible for us to discriminate between these two RNA modifications using this technique (49). However, since m 6 A m is only found directly adjacent to the 7-methylguanosine cap on mRNA (50), we are confident that most of the changes we observe are m 6 A, but we cannot discount the possibility of changes in m 6 A m as well.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another RNA modification is 5-methylcytosine (5-mC) which is also an epigenetic mark. The details of the methods utilized for the understanding the different types RNA modifications are summarized in Table 1 [33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42].…”
Section: Rna Methylationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These features insure that the nucleotide modiications are accurately assigned to the appropriate RNA and not falsely atributed to homologous genes or RNA contaminates [6]. Now, several high-throughput NGS-based technologies, including RNA-seq, have been established to proile and quantitate RNA modiications (m A marks at singlenucleotide resolution [38]. As illustrated in Figure 1B Chemical-based methods rely on the misincorporation of nucleotide or nucleotide conversion to truncate or stop RNA products during reverse transcription.…”
Section: Ngs-based Rna Modiication Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%