2014
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0102612
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms with Cis-Regulatory Effects on Long Non-Coding Transcripts in Human Primary Monocytes

Abstract: We applied genome-wide allele-specific expression analysis of monocytes from 188 samples. Monocytes were purified from white blood cells of healthy blood donors to detect cis-acting genetic variation that regulates the expression of long non-coding RNAs. We analysed 8929 regions harboring genes for potential long non-coding RNA that were retrieved from data from the ENCODE project. Of these regions, 60% were annotated as intergenic, which implies that they do not overlap with protein-coding genes. Focusing on … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in recent years, lncRNAs were reported to be involved in gene regulation and other cellular processes ( Quinn and Chang, 2016 ). With an ASE analysis, Almlof et al (2014) found that 22.9% (258 out of 1122) of intergenic lncRNAs were regulated by cis -rSNP in human primary monocytes, which is comparable to our analysis. Though the number of lncRNAs exceeded the protein coding genes, because of a much lower expression ( Iyer et al, 2015 ), a higher sequencing depth and more sensitive detector is required to quantify ASE in lncRNAs more efficiently.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…However, in recent years, lncRNAs were reported to be involved in gene regulation and other cellular processes ( Quinn and Chang, 2016 ). With an ASE analysis, Almlof et al (2014) found that 22.9% (258 out of 1122) of intergenic lncRNAs were regulated by cis -rSNP in human primary monocytes, which is comparable to our analysis. Though the number of lncRNAs exceeded the protein coding genes, because of a much lower expression ( Iyer et al, 2015 ), a higher sequencing depth and more sensitive detector is required to quantify ASE in lncRNAs more efficiently.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Some studies have analyzed tumor and normal samples without making any adjustments to the applied methodology, which risks identifying false positives where the detected ASE is mainly due to copy-number alterations [ 11 ]. Others have removed all sites overlapping copy-number variants [ 7 , 12 , 13 ], or used the genomic DNA (gDNA) allelic ratios (ARs) to correct for the observed allelic imbalances [ 14 , 15 ] or to remove SNPs with allelic imbalances detected in the control input DNA [ 2 ], which is feasible only when the coverage at any assayed heterozygous site is high (>20 × if a binomial test is to be applied to reach adequate statistical power [ 9 , 12 ]). Recently, Liu et al [ 16 ] developed cisASE, a likelihood-based method for detecting ASE.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The possibility that the association signal upstream of the target lncRNA overlaps a regulatory region with cis effects on the lncRNA expression and the target cis mRNA cannot be excluded. Several examples of co-regulated lncRNA and protein-coding loci by the same cis -rSNP, the so-called enhancer RNA (eRNA), have been reported ( Almlof et al . 2014 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%