2021
DOI: 10.3389/fped.2021.682160
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms Interactions of the Surfactant Protein Genes Associated With Respiratory Distress Syndrome Susceptibility in Preterm Infants

Abstract: Background: Neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), due to surfactant deficiency in preterm infants, is the most common cause of respiratory morbidity. The surfactant proteins (SFTP) genetic variants have been well-studied in association with RDS; however, the impact of SNP-SNP (single nucleotide polymorphism) interactions on RDS has not been addressed. Therefore, this study utilizes a newer statistical model to determine the association of SFTP single SNP model and SNP-SNP interactions in a two and a th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
17
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 100 publications
(114 reference statements)
1
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, the pattern of SNPs and their interactions was unique to each disease population. For example, SNPs of the SFTPB and the SFTPC by themselves and/or through their interactions were significantly associated with cystic fibrosis ( Lin et al, 2018 ), whereas, SNPs of the SFTPA1 and SFTPA2 and their interactions were associated with an increased HP risk in a Mexican population ( Gandhi et al, 2021 ) and RDS in prematurely born neonates ( Amatya et al, 2021 ). The majority of the significant interactions associated with an increased ARF risk involved SFTPA2 SNPs, whereas the majority of the significant interactions associated with an increased risk of pulmonary dysfunction at discharge involved SFTPA1 SNP s in the same dataset ( Gandhi et al, 2020a ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, the pattern of SNPs and their interactions was unique to each disease population. For example, SNPs of the SFTPB and the SFTPC by themselves and/or through their interactions were significantly associated with cystic fibrosis ( Lin et al, 2018 ), whereas, SNPs of the SFTPA1 and SFTPA2 and their interactions were associated with an increased HP risk in a Mexican population ( Gandhi et al, 2021 ) and RDS in prematurely born neonates ( Amatya et al, 2021 ). The majority of the significant interactions associated with an increased ARF risk involved SFTPA2 SNPs, whereas the majority of the significant interactions associated with an increased risk of pulmonary dysfunction at discharge involved SFTPA1 SNP s in the same dataset ( Gandhi et al, 2020a ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the SFTPB gene, there was one significant intragenic interaction (rs2077079, rs3024798, and rs7316). Each SNP exhibited a dominant effect, and this interaction was associated with a decreased risk of RDS ( 2 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the incidence of RDS is inversely related to gestational age, preterm delivery alone does not determine the risk of developing the disorder. Several studies have suggested the possible involvement of surfactant protein (SP) SP-A2 and SP-B, SP-C, and SP-D common genetic polymorphisms in the genetic predisposition to RDS ( 2 8 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This SNP-SNP interaction approach ( 57 ) has been used and validated in studying associations of high order epistatic interactions with various acute and chronic pulmonary diseases ( 21 , 47 , 58 , 59 ). The cases and controls were converted into a 2 × 2 contingency table and various types of epistatic interactions at different orders were tested.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present study, we used a statistical approach ( 57 ) where novel statistical models were studied to enable investigation of the epistatic effects of SNP-SNP interactions as has been done for other pulmonary diseases ( 21 , 47 , 58 , 59 ). Using this novel approach, we reanalyzed IPF data that were previously published.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%