2004
DOI: 10.3892/or.12.5.1033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single nucleotide polymorphism in the hypoxia-inducible factor-1α gene in colorectal carcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
43
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
43
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, the C1772T and G1790A mutation rates in pancreatic cancer were 10% (1/10) and 0%, respectively, for pancreatic cancer and 6.3% (1/16) and 6.3% (1/16), respectively, for gallbladder cancer (all heteromutation-type). These results, together with those of previous reports (2,(8)(9)(10)(11) show a low SNP rate for all cancers, except renal cancer, suggesting the lack of an association between SNPs and carcinogenesis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this study, the C1772T and G1790A mutation rates in pancreatic cancer were 10% (1/10) and 0%, respectively, for pancreatic cancer and 6.3% (1/16) and 6.3% (1/16), respectively, for gallbladder cancer (all heteromutation-type). These results, together with those of previous reports (2,(8)(9)(10)(11) show a low SNP rate for all cancers, except renal cancer, suggesting the lack of an association between SNPs and carcinogenesis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…However, type 2 diabetes mellitus is a risk factor for pancreatic cancer, which suggests an association between the development of pancreatic cancer and the SNPs of HIF-1α. There have been studies on an association between carcinogenesis and HIF-1α SNPs in cancer in various organs (2,(8)(9)(10)(11). The C1772T and G1790A mutation rates were reported to be 18 and 11%, respectively, in patients with head or neck cancer, and 11 and 8%, respectively, in healthy subjects, with no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups (2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the exact mechanism of these polymorphisms in the development of digestive cancer is not clearly understood (Huang et al, 2012). Recent evidence has suggested that HIF-1α gene polymorphisms may be associated with increased digestive cancer risk (Ling et al, 2005;Fransen et al, 2006;Li et al, 2009;Hsiao et al, 2010;Kang et al, 2011;Wang et al, 2011); however, individually published results are inconclusive (Kuwai et al, 2004;Knechtel et al, 2010). Therefore, we attempt to perform a meta-analysis of all eligible case-control studies to provide insights into these associations, which may promote our understanding of the exact role of the HIF-1α gene in the development of carcinogenesis in the digestive organs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Two common functional polymorphisms, C1772T (rs11549465 C>T) and G1790A (rs11549467 G>A), in the human HIF-1α gene that cause amino acid substitutions within the oxygen-dependent degradation domain may result in the overexpression of this protein and subsequent changes in the expression of downstream target genes, thus contributing to cancer development and progression (Chau et al, 2005). Several previous studies have suggested that HIF-1α C1772T and G1790A polymorphisms may play important roles in the risk of digestive cancer (Ling et al, 2005;Fransen et al, 2006;Li et al, 2009;Hsiao et al, 2010;Kang et al, 2011;Wang et al, 2011), while other studies found no convincing evidence of these polymorphisms in increasing susceptibility to digestive cancer (Kuwai et al, 2004;Knechtel et al, 2010). This controversy could be explained with several reasons such as the differences in study designs, sample size, ethnicity, source of controls, cancer types, and genotype methods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation