2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjane.2019.01.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single needle versus double needle celiac trunk neurolysis in abdominal malignancy pain management: a randomized controlled trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Three RCTs were done with CT guidance generating superior quality of evidence for this modality. The single-vs. double-needle approach was compared in one showing the single-needle approach to be equally efficacious (24). A second important study showed that the addition of superior hypogastric block to CPB may be of additional benefit in patients with upper abdominal malignancies (25).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three RCTs were done with CT guidance generating superior quality of evidence for this modality. The single-vs. double-needle approach was compared in one showing the single-needle approach to be equally efficacious (24). A second important study showed that the addition of superior hypogastric block to CPB may be of additional benefit in patients with upper abdominal malignancies (25).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, it can be completed with a single needle puncture. Requirement of fewer punctures may reduce the associated complications and the time required to perform the procedure [ 15 , 18 ], thereby reducing patient burden. Third, anatomically, it is less likely to cause organ or nerve damage than the anterior approach or paravertebral approach [ 12 , 13 , 15 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several lines of treatment such as surgical, pharmacological and neurolytic blocks [ 8 ]. Although opioids stay the cornerstone of cancer pain management, they produce many harmful side effects with negative impacts on the patient’s life [ 9 , 10 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%