2013
DOI: 10.1039/c3cp44574g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single nanoparticle plasmonics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
190
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 177 publications
(193 citation statements)
references
References 184 publications
3
190
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[1][2][3] This collective oscillation leads to an enhanced and confined electric field around the particle. [3][4][5] This phenomenon, called surface plasmon resonance (SPR), has been intensively studied both experimentally [6][7][8][9][10] and theoretically. [11][12][13][14][15][16] Applications include high-sensitivity chemical and biological sensing [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] as well as energy conversion and storage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3] This collective oscillation leads to an enhanced and confined electric field around the particle. [3][4][5] This phenomenon, called surface plasmon resonance (SPR), has been intensively studied both experimentally [6][7][8][9][10] and theoretically. [11][12][13][14][15][16] Applications include high-sensitivity chemical and biological sensing [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] as well as energy conversion and storage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Actually seen from the 3D surface charge plot, the two poles in the middle part of the sphere merge into a big pole, thus only three poles charge are present for each sphere. This mode is the second-order standing-wave plasmon mode commonly observed in plasmonic nanorods 20,49 at an energy just above that of the dipole. The plasmon hybridization theory predicts a red shift in wavelength (i.e., decreased resonance energy) for the bonding mode and a small blue shift (i.e., increased resonance energy) for the antibonding mode with respect to the isolated, single particle resonance energy.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…[16][17][18] In addition, experimental mapping of surface plasmons with nanoscale resolution is inherently difficult due to the diffraction limit of light. 19,20 Various approaches such as cathodoluminescence (CL) spectroscopy, 21 and near-field optical spectroscopy 22 can be employed to overcome this limit and gain information about the local electric fields with few nanometer resolution, Recently, electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS) performed in the low-loss regime has emerged as a powerful tool for mapping LSPRs. [23][24][25][26] However the interpretation of plasmonic EELS data can be difficult, even more so when trying to correlate with near-or far-field light scattering as these techniques do not capture the same information, in particular in the presence of dark modes 27,28 or hot spots between coupled nanoparticles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nanoparticles (NP) prepared from dielectric [4], semiconductor [5], metal [6][7][8][9], and magnetic [10,11] materials have recently become important elements of biosensor technology due to their ability to prepare their surfaces with ligands that enable them to recognize specific target molecules, and their ability to interact with electromagnetic fields in useful ways. Magnetic NPs can be used to facilitate particle manipulation while at the same time providing a mass amplification tag for acoustic biosensors [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%