Abstract:This paper describes a computational
imaging platform to determine
the orientation of anisotropic optical probes under differential interference
contrast (DIC) microscopy. We established a deep-learning model based
on data sets of DIC images collected from metal nanoparticle optical
probes at different orientations. This model predicted the in-plane
angle of gold nanorods with an error below 20°, the inherent
limit of the DIC method. Using low-symmetry gold nanostars as optical
probes, we demonstrated the dete… Show more
“…In situ monitoring of nanoconstruct-cell interactions using NPs as probes can deconvolute the effects of NP shape and protein corona in physiologically relevant conditions. However, because of the intrinsic low optical contrast compared to cells, ligand-functionalized organic NPs and DNA origamis cannot function as probes without conjugation to dyes or inorganic nanoparticles. − In contrast, gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) can be tracked via optical methods, because of their strong scattering properties, and also have advantages as probes because they are biocompatible, can be synthesized into various shapes, , and can be covalently functionalized with diverse ligands. − Anisotropic AuNPs such as gold nanostars (AuNS) show angle-dependent patterns in differential interference contrast (DIC) microscopy − with potential for 3D orientation tracking, which can provide information on ligand–receptor binding and endocytosis at the molecular level.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17−19 In contrast, gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) can be tracked via optical methods, because of their strong scattering properties, 20 and also have advantages as probes because they are biocompatible, can be synthesized into various shapes, 21,22 and can be covalently functionalized with diverse ligands. 23−25 Anisotropic AuNPs such as gold nanostars (AuNS) show angle-dependent patterns in differential interference contrast (DIC) microscopy 26−28 with potential for 3D orientation tracking, 29 which can provide information on ligand−receptor binding and endocytosis at the molecular level.…”
Nanoparticle
carriers are effective drug delivery vehicles. Along
with other design parameters including size, composition, and surface
charge, particle shape strongly influences cellular uptake. How nanoparticle
geometry affects targeted delivery under physiologically relevant
conditions, however, is inconclusive. Here, we demonstrate that nanoconstruct core shape influences
the dynamics of targeting ligand–receptor interactions on cancer
cell membranes. By single-particle tracking of translational and rotational
motion, we compared DNA aptamer AS1411 conjugated gold nanostars (AS1411-AuNS)
and 50 nm gold spheres (AS1411-50NPs) on cells with and without targeted
nucleolin membrane receptors. On nucleolin-expressing cells, AS1411-AuNS
exhibited faster velocities under directed diffusion and translated
over larger areas during restricted diffusion compared to AS1411-50NPs,
despite their similar protein corona profiles. On nucleolin-inhibited
cells, AS1411-AuNS showed faster rotation dynamics over smaller translational
areas, while AS1411-50NPs did not display significant changes in translation.
These differences in translational and rotational motions indicate
that nanoparticle shape affects how targeting nanoconstructs bind
to cell-membrane receptors.
“…In situ monitoring of nanoconstruct-cell interactions using NPs as probes can deconvolute the effects of NP shape and protein corona in physiologically relevant conditions. However, because of the intrinsic low optical contrast compared to cells, ligand-functionalized organic NPs and DNA origamis cannot function as probes without conjugation to dyes or inorganic nanoparticles. − In contrast, gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) can be tracked via optical methods, because of their strong scattering properties, and also have advantages as probes because they are biocompatible, can be synthesized into various shapes, , and can be covalently functionalized with diverse ligands. − Anisotropic AuNPs such as gold nanostars (AuNS) show angle-dependent patterns in differential interference contrast (DIC) microscopy − with potential for 3D orientation tracking, which can provide information on ligand–receptor binding and endocytosis at the molecular level.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17−19 In contrast, gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) can be tracked via optical methods, because of their strong scattering properties, 20 and also have advantages as probes because they are biocompatible, can be synthesized into various shapes, 21,22 and can be covalently functionalized with diverse ligands. 23−25 Anisotropic AuNPs such as gold nanostars (AuNS) show angle-dependent patterns in differential interference contrast (DIC) microscopy 26−28 with potential for 3D orientation tracking, 29 which can provide information on ligand−receptor binding and endocytosis at the molecular level.…”
Nanoparticle
carriers are effective drug delivery vehicles. Along
with other design parameters including size, composition, and surface
charge, particle shape strongly influences cellular uptake. How nanoparticle
geometry affects targeted delivery under physiologically relevant
conditions, however, is inconclusive. Here, we demonstrate that nanoconstruct core shape influences
the dynamics of targeting ligand–receptor interactions on cancer
cell membranes. By single-particle tracking of translational and rotational
motion, we compared DNA aptamer AS1411 conjugated gold nanostars (AS1411-AuNS)
and 50 nm gold spheres (AS1411-50NPs) on cells with and without targeted
nucleolin membrane receptors. On nucleolin-expressing cells, AS1411-AuNS
exhibited faster velocities under directed diffusion and translated
over larger areas during restricted diffusion compared to AS1411-50NPs,
despite their similar protein corona profiles. On nucleolin-inhibited
cells, AS1411-AuNS showed faster rotation dynamics over smaller translational
areas, while AS1411-50NPs did not display significant changes in translation.
These differences in translational and rotational motions indicate
that nanoparticle shape affects how targeting nanoconstructs bind
to cell-membrane receptors.
“… 69 Another study established a computational imaging platform to determine the 3D orientation of anisotropic optical nanoprobes based on acquired DICM images. 73 The model predicted the orientation of nanorods with a high degree of accuracy and has the potential to enable a robust, rapid, and fully automated tracking of particle rotations during interaction with living cells.…”
Label-free detection of nanoparticles is essential for a thorough evaluation of their cellular effects. In particular, nanoparticles intended for medical applications must be carefully analyzed in terms of their interactions with cells, tissues, and organs. Since the labeling causes a strong change in the physicochemical properties and thus also alters the interactions of the particles with the surrounding tissue, the use of fluorescently labeled particles is inadequate to characterize the effects of unlabeled particles. Further, labeling may affect cellular uptake and biocompatibility of nanoparticles. Thus, label-free techniques have been recently developed and implemented to ensure a reliable characterization of nanoparticles.
This review provides an overview of frequently used label-free visualization techniques and highlights recent studies on the development and usage of microscopy systems based on reflectance, darkfield, differential interference contrast, optical coherence, photothermal, holographic, photoacoustic, total internal reflection, surface plasmon resonance, Rayleigh light scattering, hyperspectral and reflectance structured illumination imaging. Using these imaging modalities, there is a strong enhancement in the reliability of experiments concerning cellular uptake and biocompatibility of nanoparticles, which is crucial for preclinical evaluations and future medical applications.
“…It may become an extremely useful assisting tool for experimental measurements. The demonstrations in this field include characterization of orientation [204] or size [205] of metallic nanoparticles using measured spectral data. ML find its applications in a variety of microscopy and imaging techniques [206,207] as well as for tracking [208], localization [209] and analysis of single molecules [210].…”
In the recent years, we observe a dramatic boost of research in photonics empowered by the concepts of machine learning and artificial intelligence. The corresponding photonic systems, to which this new methodology is applied, can range from traditional optical waveguides to nanoantennas and metasurfaces, and these novel approaches underpin the fundamental principles of light-matter interaction developed for a smart design of intelligent photonic devices. Concepts and approaches of artificial intelligence and machine learning penetrate rapidly into the fundamental physics of light, and they provide effective tools for the study of the field of metaphotonics driven by opticallyinduced electric and magnetic resonances. Here, we introduce this new field with its application to metaphotonics and also present a summary of the basic concepts of machine learning with some specific examples developed and demonstrated for metasystems and metasurfaces.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.