2016
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.93.012410
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single-molecule force measurements of the polymerizing dimeric subunit of von Willebrand factor

Abstract: Von Willebrand factor (VWF) multimers are large adhesive proteins that are essential to the initiation of hemostatic plugs at sites of vascular injury. The binding of VWF multimers to platelets, as well as VWF proteolysis, is regulated by shear stresses that alter VWF multimeric conformation. We used single molecule manipulation with atomic force microscopy (AFM) to investigate the effect of high fluid shear stress on soluble dimeric and multimeric forms of VWF. VWF dimers are the smallest unit that polymerize… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(43 reference statements)
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Usually, when newly released into the blood, ULVWF first attaches to the endothelial surface through P-selectin and binds platelets by forming strands with other molecules. ULVWF becomes very heavy after adhering to platelets, when drafted by the sheer force and torsional force from strong blood flow, the binding sites of A1 and A3 domains to ADAMTS13 will be exposed [5]. The A2 domain is not involved in the binding process, which is due to the change of spatial structure after platelet binding to ULVWF and the change of capture speed between ADAMTS13 and ULVWF at high velocity.…”
Section: Vwf and Adamts13mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Usually, when newly released into the blood, ULVWF first attaches to the endothelial surface through P-selectin and binds platelets by forming strands with other molecules. ULVWF becomes very heavy after adhering to platelets, when drafted by the sheer force and torsional force from strong blood flow, the binding sites of A1 and A3 domains to ADAMTS13 will be exposed [5]. The A2 domain is not involved in the binding process, which is due to the change of spatial structure after platelet binding to ULVWF and the change of capture speed between ADAMTS13 and ULVWF at high velocity.…”
Section: Vwf and Adamts13mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, it should be noted that, both in the AFM and in the flow experiments, A1 domains were immobilized on a surface and not subjected to significant forces prior to binding, in contrast to the situation in vivo, where A1 domains within elongated VWF multimers in flow can be expected to experience forces that are large enough to potentially induce relevant conformational changes (Kim, Hudson, & Springer, 2015;Zhang et al, 2009). In two further AFM-based studies, Wijeratne et al (2013Wijeratne et al ( , 2016 performed force measurements on VWF multimers and dimers after exposure to high shear stress. They reported that peaks in the obtained force-extension traces, which were interpreted as domain unfolding events, occurred at higher forces for sheared than for nonsheared multimers.…”
Section: Force-dependent Binding Kineticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In two further AFM‐based studies, Wijeratne et al (, ) performed force measurements on VWF multimers and dimers after exposure to high shear stress. They reported that peaks in the obtained force‐extension traces, which were interpreted as domain unfolding events, occurred at higher forces for sheared than for non‐sheared multimers.…”
Section: Intrinsic Force‐regulation Of the A1‐gpibα Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cells were allowed to recover for 4 s between each F−D curve cycle. 36,37 Figure 2 shows typical F−D curves from AFM pulling of single cells. The F−D curve begins with a rapid rise to its maximum and forms a high force region within one micrometer.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cantilever was then retracted at a constant speed of 3 μm/s and a force versus distance ( F – D ) curve was recorded. Cells were allowed to recover for 4 s between each F – D curve cycle. , …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%