2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.orl.2013.05.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single machine scheduling with job-dependent convex cost and arbitrary precedence constraints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With a modified analysis, they show that the algorithm by Cheung and Shmoys is, in fact, a pseudopolynomial time 4-approximation, yielding a (4 + ε)-approximation in polynomial time. Restricting to job-specific convex cost functions, Carrasco et al [2013] give an O(1)-speed 1-approximation algorithm for the setting with arbitrary precedence constraints. Regarding the preemptive problem variant with nonuniform release dates, Im et al [2012] show that there exists no O(1)-speed O(1)-competitive online algorithm for general cost functions.…”
Section: Relatedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With a modified analysis, they show that the algorithm by Cheung and Shmoys is, in fact, a pseudopolynomial time 4-approximation, yielding a (4 + ε)-approximation in polynomial time. Restricting to job-specific convex cost functions, Carrasco et al [2013] give an O(1)-speed 1-approximation algorithm for the setting with arbitrary precedence constraints. Regarding the preemptive problem variant with nonuniform release dates, Im et al [2012] show that there exists no O(1)-speed O(1)-competitive online algorithm for general cost functions.…”
Section: Relatedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Job scheduling has been studied for decades. In fact, the Min-WCS problem is a special case of singlemachine scheduling with a non-linear objective function under precedence constraints, which has been studied by Schulz and Verschae [15] and Carrasco et al [16]. Specifically, for any > 0, the algorithm proposed by Schulz and Verschae approximates the optimum within a factor of (2+ ) when the objective function is concave [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, for any > 0, the algorithm proposed by Schulz and Verschae approximates the optimum within a factor of (2+ ) when the objective function is concave [15]. When the objective function is convex, Carrasco et al proposed a (4 + )-speed 1-approximation algorithm for any > 0 [16]. 3 The solutions proposed by Schulz and Verschae [15] and Carrasco et al [16] are based on linear programming rounding.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For a set of real-time tasks with precedence constraints executed on a distributed system, Mishra et al [52] proposed static and dynamic power management schemes. In reference [24], α-point scheduling techniques (discussed later) were used to compute approximate solutions for a general class of scheduling problems with each job having a convex non-decreasing cost function. Agrawal and Rao [2] showed that energy-aware scheduling is a generalization of the makespan minimization scheduling problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%