2021
DOI: 10.23919/jsee.2021.000047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single-layer angularly-stable bandpass frequency-selective surface with interdigital resonator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The calculated shielding effectiveness (SE) is greater than those presented in Xin et al 18 and Ma et al 19 while comparable with those from Sampath et al 10,13,14 Though Qu et al 16 offer higher shielding effectiveness, the unit cell is 89.4% larger than the proposed FSS element. The prototype FSS offers good angular stability and excellent polarization stability with frequency deviation for angles up to 60° in TE and TM polarization modes unlike the FSS described in Chou et al 15 and Xin et al 18 The proposed FSS is a dual‐layer single substrate solution whereas Zhao et al 12 reported a three‐layer dual‐substrate solution to demonstrate miniaturization. Hence, it can be concluded that the proposed FSS has a simple geometry with high reproducibility and low manufacturing cost making it viable.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 73%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The calculated shielding effectiveness (SE) is greater than those presented in Xin et al 18 and Ma et al 19 while comparable with those from Sampath et al 10,13,14 Though Qu et al 16 offer higher shielding effectiveness, the unit cell is 89.4% larger than the proposed FSS element. The prototype FSS offers good angular stability and excellent polarization stability with frequency deviation for angles up to 60° in TE and TM polarization modes unlike the FSS described in Chou et al 15 and Xin et al 18 The proposed FSS is a dual‐layer single substrate solution whereas Zhao et al 12 reported a three‐layer dual‐substrate solution to demonstrate miniaturization. Hence, it can be concluded that the proposed FSS has a simple geometry with high reproducibility and low manufacturing cost making it viable.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…In addition to miniaturization, the bandwidth performance and the shielding effective performance are better than the research reported in the literature. The proposed FSS offers good | S 21 | bandwidth more than those presented in other studies 3,7,10,12,14,18,19 . The calculated shielding effectiveness (SE) is greater than those presented in Xin et al 18 and Ma et al 19 while comparable with those from Sampath et al 10,13,14 Though Qu et al 16 offer higher shielding effectiveness, the unit cell is 89.4% larger than the proposed FSS element.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 47%
See 2 more Smart Citations