2013
DOI: 10.1002/ejic.201301076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single‐Ion Magnetism in a Luminescent Er3+ β‐Diketonato Complex with Multiple Relaxation Mechanisms

Abstract: In the crystal structure of tris(2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-3,5-heptanedionato)mono(bathophenanthroline)erbium(III), C 57 H 73 -ErN 2 O 6 , the Er 3+ ion is in an antiprismatic environment, surrounded by two N atoms and six O atoms. The β-diketonato ligands show structural disorder. The ac susceptibility studies conducted at frequencies from 33 to 9995 Hz and at temperatures from 1.7 to 10 K revealed that the application of a static [a]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This fact can be explained by the magnetic anisotropy of the compound, which is further confirmed by the non-superimposition of the M vs. B/T curves at lower temperatures (Figure 6b). Clear evidence for slow relaxation of the magnetisation is also given by measuring the AC susceptibility components, ' and ", at fixed frequencies in the low temperature range, 1.6-10 K. In a similar fashion to what was observed in other Er 3+ complexes classified as SIMs [17], under zero DC field the in-phase component, ', was found to be almost frequency independent, while the out-of-phase component, '', presents a small frequency dependence with a local maximum shifting to higher temperatures as frequency increases (Figure 7a). The application of a small static magnetic field of 500 Oe drastically changes the relaxation dynamics with the occurrence of peaks in both ' and '' components, that which show strong frequency and temperature dependence (Figure 7b and Figure 7c).…”
Section: Magnetic Measurementssupporting
confidence: 66%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This fact can be explained by the magnetic anisotropy of the compound, which is further confirmed by the non-superimposition of the M vs. B/T curves at lower temperatures (Figure 6b). Clear evidence for slow relaxation of the magnetisation is also given by measuring the AC susceptibility components, ' and ", at fixed frequencies in the low temperature range, 1.6-10 K. In a similar fashion to what was observed in other Er 3+ complexes classified as SIMs [17], under zero DC field the in-phase component, ', was found to be almost frequency independent, while the out-of-phase component, '', presents a small frequency dependence with a local maximum shifting to higher temperatures as frequency increases (Figure 7a). The application of a small static magnetic field of 500 Oe drastically changes the relaxation dynamics with the occurrence of peaks in both ' and '' components, that which show strong frequency and temperature dependence (Figure 7b and Figure 7c).…”
Section: Magnetic Measurementssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…When plotted with the correspondent inverse of temperature, these single relaxation times  have an activated temperature dependency (Figure 8b) that follows an Arrhenius law, (T) = 0·exp(Eeff/kBT) in the higher temperature range (dashed line), with a pre-exponential factor 0 = 1.73×10 -8 s and an effective relaxation barrier of Eeff = 26.8 K (18.6 cm -1 ) which are within the range of most of other well-known d- [33,34] and f-element SMMs [17,18,35]. In the lower temperature range, a clear deviation from this activated regime is noticed, likely due to the approaching of a quantum tunnelling regime expected to occur at lower temperatures.…”
Section: Magnetic Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 59%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Eu-O and Eu-N distances and angles ( Table 2) are within normal ranges [26] and correspond to a distorted square antiprismatic geometry around Eu 3 þ . This type of geometry occurs frequently for trivalent lanthanide ions coordinated with diketonates [27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34]. The angle between the top and bottom square faces of the antiprism is 2.75(5)1.…”
Section: Structural Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 97%