2018
DOI: 10.3390/s18124299
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single Infrared Image-Based Stripe Nonuniformity Correction via a Two-Stage Filtering Method

Abstract: The presence of stripe nonuniformity severely degrades the image quality and affects the performance in many infrared (IR) sensing applications. Prior works correct the nonuniformity by using similar spatial representations, which inevitably damage some detailed structures of the image. In this paper, we instead take advantage of spectral prior of stripe noise to solve its correction problem in single IR image. We first analyse the significant spectral difference between stripes and image structures and utiliz… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(a) DLSNUC [4] (b) DMRN [7] (c) Proposed To compare the quantitative performance of our proposed method against the comparative FPN removal methods, we employed three kinds of reference-free image quality metrics. Roughness [34], root-mean-square error of the horizontal adjacent pixel (RMSE-AP) [33], and average vertical gradient error (AVGE) [36]. The roughness index can measure the high-frequency components in both horizontal and vertical directions.…”
Section: Comparative Experiments Using the Real Infrared Imagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(a) DLSNUC [4] (b) DMRN [7] (c) Proposed To compare the quantitative performance of our proposed method against the comparative FPN removal methods, we employed three kinds of reference-free image quality metrics. Roughness [34], root-mean-square error of the horizontal adjacent pixel (RMSE-AP) [33], and average vertical gradient error (AVGE) [36]. The roughness index can measure the high-frequency components in both horizontal and vertical directions.…”
Section: Comparative Experiments Using the Real Infrared Imagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where P is the reconstructed image with m rows and n columns, P(i, j) is a pixel signal in the i-th row and the j-th column. On the other hand, Zeng et al [36] introduced the AVGE that calculates the difference of gradients between real corrupted image and its reconstructed noise-free image in the vertical direction. AVGE can assess the preserving ability on the vertical details of the image, so that we applied the AVGE as a complement to the RMSE-AP index from the perspective of quantitative evaluation of information loss.…”
Section: Comparative Experiments Using the Real Infrared Imagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the visual contrast, we applied two objective indicators to evaluate the algorithm, image roughness index ρ and average vertical gradient error (AVGE) [30].…”
Section: Stripe Correction Algorithm Comparison Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed algorithm (Figure 15e) and CNN algorithm ( Figure 15d) have similar results; small changes corresponding to image details are preserved, with stripe noise being simultaneously smoothed. In addition to the visual contrast, we applied two objective indicators to evaluate the algorithm, image roughness index ρ and average vertical gradient error (AVGE) [30]. To evaluate the detail protection ability of the algorithm, we introduce the value of AVGE to illustrate the detail protection ability of the algorithm.…”
Section: Stripe Correction Algorithm Comparison Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He et al [23] used deep residual networks to end-to-end estimate the nonuniformity. Zeng et al [24] proposed a two-stage filtering NUC method which was suitable for stripe FPN correction.…”
Section: Scene-based Nonuniformity Correctionmentioning
confidence: 99%