2012
DOI: 10.1089/lap.2012.0120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single-Incision Versus Three-Port Conventional Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy: Is There Any Real Need to Go Single?

Abstract: Despite its feasibility for right hemicolectomy and its equivalent short-term surgical and oncological outcome compared with conventional laparoscopy, SILS demonstrated no significant advantages in terms of surgical incision length and postoperative course compared with 3PCL-RH. We acknowledge that the small sample size and the nonrandomized design are a limit of the study. Thus, prospective randomized controlled trials are recommended to prove the superiority of single-incision laparoscopic right hemicolectom… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The literature search identified one randomized contro lled trial and 13 cased-matched control or comparative studies [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] . In total, 1559 colorectal resections were included, 589 by SILC and 970 by CLC.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature search identified one randomized contro lled trial and 13 cased-matched control or comparative studies [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] . In total, 1559 colorectal resections were included, 589 by SILC and 970 by CLC.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There was no statistically significant difference between groups in overall morbidity (14.6% single incision vs 16.3% conventional laparoscopic group, P = 0.93) (Fig. ) or in overall mortality (0.82% single incision vs 1.16% conventional laparoscopic group, P = 0.80) (Fig. ) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…There were no significant differences between groups regarding the occurrence of postoperative ileus ( P = 0.91). The passage of flatus was reported only in three trials, and the data could not be pooled, but all studies reported similar results between the two groups (two to four postoperative days in both groups) . Wound infection seemed lower in r‐SILC (6.2% vs 3.9%), but this was not statistically significant ( P = 0.25) (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…А после получения первого опыта ограничениями к операциям из ЕЛД остались только ИМТ и наличие злокачественных опухолей [29]. По мнению ряда авторов, небольшой опыт операций из ЕЛД не позволяет оценить их без-опасность, в том числе онкологическую [31][32][33][34][35]. Другая группа авторов наоборот утверждает, что вы-полнение операций из единого лапароскопического доступа безопасно [36][37][38].…”
unclassified