2015
DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000000712
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single-incision Versus Multiple-incision Thoracoscopic Lobectomy and Segmentectomy

Abstract: Single-incision thoracoscopic lobectomy and segmentectomy are feasible, and perioperative outcomes are comparable with those of the multiple-incision approach.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

7
110
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(119 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
7
110
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Wang et al (21) reported that single-incision thoracoscopic lobectomy and segmentectomy are technically feasible methods and that their perioperative outcomes are similar to those of the multiple-incision approach. Unfortunately, no study has compared single-port VATS sleeve lobectomy with the multiple approaches.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wang et al (21) reported that single-incision thoracoscopic lobectomy and segmentectomy are technically feasible methods and that their perioperative outcomes are similar to those of the multiple-incision approach. Unfortunately, no study has compared single-port VATS sleeve lobectomy with the multiple approaches.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other limitations of the systematic review included the variable reporting of conversions in different studies and variable grading of postoperative morbidities. Whilst most studies included conversion rates (from single port to multiportal VATS or from VATS to open thoracotomy) in their analysis of surgical outcomes, Wang and colleagues used conversion as one of their exclusion criteria for statistical analysis (22). Furthermore, some studies accounted for a learning curve period by excluding the initial patients who underwent uniportal VATS from analysis in order to exclude the learning curve (21).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wang and colleagues noted that a randomized control trial could not be easily performed in this setting, but suggested further prospective studies in the future (22). In order to minimize patient selection bias due to the non-random allocation of treatment, three studies performed propensity-matched analyses to improve the matching of patients according to relevant prognostic factors (20)(21)(22). Other limitations of the systematic review included the variable reporting of conversions in different studies and variable grading of postoperative morbidities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations