2003
DOI: 10.1053/otsm.2003.35891
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single incision technique for distal biceps tendon repair: using the endobutton

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The anatomical description of a high degree of fascicle interconnection within the distal biceps tendon supports the use of suture anchor (Burton and Arciero, 2003) and endobutton (Bain et al, 2000;Fox and Fernandez, 2003;Bain et al, 2005) techniques when surgical repair is required. It has been previously reported that endobutton repairs had the greatest pull out strength (Chavan et al, 2008), but this has been refuted (Henry et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The anatomical description of a high degree of fascicle interconnection within the distal biceps tendon supports the use of suture anchor (Burton and Arciero, 2003) and endobutton (Bain et al, 2000;Fox and Fernandez, 2003;Bain et al, 2005) techniques when surgical repair is required. It has been previously reported that endobutton repairs had the greatest pull out strength (Chavan et al, 2008), but this has been refuted (Henry et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…It is possible that tendons with fewer interconnections may be more vulnerable to post-repair damage, but this is yet to be tested mechanically. Commonly used procedures typically only utilize the margins of the tendon (Bain et al, 2000;Burton and Arciero, 2003;Fox and Fernandez, 2003;Bain et al, 2005) (Fig. 6b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comparison of biomechanical models of 4 different stabilization methods revealed that the EndoButton method had the highest load to failure (440 N) in comparison to the suture anchor (381 N), bone tunnel (310 N) and interference screw (232 N); the superiority of the EndoButton in this regard was statistically significant [25]. Biomechanical tests by other authors have also revealed that the EndoButton fixation method has a higher load to failure [21,25], but it still has not been proven clinically [26,27]. Since it has been shown to be the strongest form of tendon stabilization when compared with other fixation methods, the EndoButton is seen as enabling early active mobilization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some authors advocate a 2-incision technique to better visualize the radial tuberosity and minimize the dissection necessary in the antecubital fossa, 1,8,27 while other authors feel that the tuberosity can be visualized adequately with a single anterior incision with less risk of heterotopic ossification. 3,9,15,25,42 A technique through a single anterior 1.5 cm incision has also been described recently using an endoscope. 36 Repair of the tendon to the brachialis muscle and bone using sutures tied over a bony bridge, suture anchors, screw and washer, endobutton, and the use of an interference screw have all been described.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…36 Repair of the tendon to the brachialis muscle and bone using sutures tied over a bony bridge, suture anchors, screw and washer, endobutton, and the use of an interference screw have all been described. 6,9,15,25,27,36,37,39,[41][42][43] Whichever technique is chosen, performing an anatomic repair should always be the goal to best restore function. 24 Anatomy textbooks provide a vague description of the insertion of the tendon onto the radial tuberosity, but they fail to address the footprint of the tendon on the tuberosity or the rotational position of the tuberosity on the radius.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%