2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single-incision laparoscopy versus standard laparoscopy for colorectal surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

3
29
2
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
3
29
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the conversion rate to other procedures (MPLS, reduced-port laparoscopic surgery, or OS) in previous studies of SILS was about 2%-11% (24)(25)(26)(27)(28)32), the rate in this study was much higher (28%). Although the conversion rate to other procedures (MPLS, reduced-port laparoscopic surgery, or OS) in previous studies of SILS was about 2%-11% (24)(25)(26)(27)(28)32), the rate in this study was much higher (28%).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 79%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Although the conversion rate to other procedures (MPLS, reduced-port laparoscopic surgery, or OS) in previous studies of SILS was about 2%-11% (24)(25)(26)(27)(28)32), the rate in this study was much higher (28%). Although the conversion rate to other procedures (MPLS, reduced-port laparoscopic surgery, or OS) in previous studies of SILS was about 2%-11% (24)(25)(26)(27)(28)32), the rate in this study was much higher (28%).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 79%
“…Additional ports or laparoscopic needle forceps were required in 18 cases (28%) because of the presence of excessive visceral fat, dense adhesions, or invasion of other organs, which complicated the procedure. Although the conversion rate to other procedures (MPLS, reduced-port laparoscopic surgery, or OS) in previous studies of SILS was about 2%-11% (24)(25)(26)(27)(28)32), the rate in this study was much higher (28%). One of the reasons for the higher conversion rate in this study was our aim to maintain surgical quality by focusing on CME and central vessel ligation with D3 lymphadenectomy and to ensure the quality was comparable to that of MPLS.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To date, there have been many favorable studies reporting the potential benefits of SILS over multi-port laparoscopic surgery in terms of less postoperative pain, reduction of morbidity, better cosmetic outcome, and better overall patient satisfaction. [1][2][3] In spite of previous studies, the true benefits of SILS over multi-port laparoscopic approach in major colorectal surgery remain unclear. Moreover, the obvious complexity in manipulating various surgical instruments through a single port requires an adequate learning period.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%