2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00595-020-02141-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single-incision laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair with tumescent local anesthesia: report of more than 2000 procedures at a day-surgery clinic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides, there was no case need to convert to other procedures and reoperate. Consequence, it is believed the safety and short-term outcome of SIL-TPP and SIL-TEP in our study was comparable when compared to previous SIL-TEP and conventional TEP study [ 5 , 8 , 9 , 14 , 15 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Besides, there was no case need to convert to other procedures and reoperate. Consequence, it is believed the safety and short-term outcome of SIL-TPP and SIL-TEP in our study was comparable when compared to previous SIL-TEP and conventional TEP study [ 5 , 8 , 9 , 14 , 15 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Single-incision laparoscopy (SIL) has attracted interest in the past decade, mainly because it improves cosmetic outcomes and reduces trauma [ 7 ]. Besides, the safety and efficacy of SIL–TEP for inguinal hernia repair had been verified in a serious of studies [ 3 5 , 8 , 9 ]. It is regretful that almost all SIL-TEP procedure reported before were operated through the space between the front of the posterior sheath and rectus abdominis and then enter the PPS for repairing inguinal hernia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have reported the reoperation morbidity was 5.7% to 15.8% in SIL-TEP and 3.2% to 14% in CL-TEP studies. [20,22,25–27] Consequently, the morbidity rate of this study was comparable. In our study, there were one seroma, one hydrocele of testes and one suffered upper respiratory infection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Compared with conventional laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair, SIL-IHR has the potential benefits of faster postoperative recovery, less pain, and better cosmetic outcomes for patients while maintaining the advantages of a posterior approach. Due to these potential advantages, there have been numerous reports about SIL-IHR to date, suggesting that it has similar short-and longterm outcomes to conventional multi-incision laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair [4][5][6]. However, most reported cases were very limited in number [7] and focused on SIL-TEP, while short-and long-term outcomes of SIL-TAPP at large single institutions were rarely reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%