1987
DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(87)90167-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single fiber mapping of spatial excitation patterns in the electrically stimulated auditory nerve

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
72
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 192 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
7
72
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Radially oriented electrode pairs produced more restricted ICC activation patterns (and by inference more restricted activation of the auditory nerve array) than did longitudinal pairs. This conclusion is consistent with the results of studies of the influence of electrode orientation on physiological activation selectivity in the auditory nerve of hearing cats (Van den Honert and Stypulkowski 1987). This study reported that radial bipolar electrodes activated the auditory nerve highly selectively, whereas longitudinal bipolar electrodes produced much broader activation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Radially oriented electrode pairs produced more restricted ICC activation patterns (and by inference more restricted activation of the auditory nerve array) than did longitudinal pairs. This conclusion is consistent with the results of studies of the influence of electrode orientation on physiological activation selectivity in the auditory nerve of hearing cats (Van den Honert and Stypulkowski 1987). This study reported that radial bipolar electrodes activated the auditory nerve highly selectively, whereas longitudinal bipolar electrodes produced much broader activation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Studies of the spread of auditory nerve activation in response to electric stimuli have involved clinical and psychophysical studies in humans (Tong and Clark 1986;Lim et al 1989;Chatterjee and Shannon 1998;Hanekom and Shannon 1997), electrophysiological studies in animals (Woolsey and Walzl 1943; Van den Honert and Stypulkowski 1987;Snyder et al 1990Snyder et al , 1991Leake et al 1991Leake et al , 1995Leake et al , 2000Kral et al 1998;Shepherd et al 1999;Rebscher et al 2001;Taniguchi et al 1997;Raggio and Schreiner. 1999;Bierer and Middlebrooks 2002;Middlebrooks and Bierer 2002), and theoretical modeling studies (Finley 1989;Finley et al 1987Finley et al , 1990Frijns et al 1994Frijns et al , 1995Frijns et al , 1996Rattay et al 2001a,b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, the feline functions suggest a general trend for greater spike-rate limitation for higher threshold ANFs, a trend consistent threshold-related adaptation reported by Zhang et al (2007). The broad distribution of ANF rate-level functions is consistent with estimated 12-20 dB ranges of ANF thresholds within the feline auditory nerve (van den Honert and Stypulkowski 1987a;Miller et al 1999b). …”
Section: Relationship Between Ecap Thresholds and Dynamic Ranges Of Anfssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…This study focused on analyses of three measures of ANF responses (spike rate, VS, and F 0 amplitude) and how they varied as functions of time (using the 50 ms epochs) and changes in stimulus level. As noted before, initial spike rate was chosen as a means of assessing stimulus-level effects across a group of ANFs, as fibers will exhibit a range of electric thresholds, presumably due to the across-nerve gradient in stimulus strength and ANF fiber diameter (van den Honert and Stypulkowski 1987a;Miller et al 1999b). Pulse trains were presented repeatedly (typically 30 times) to obtain ANF firing statistics, with a 900-ms silent period between trains.…”
Section: Stimulus Presentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparisons of neuronal responses to monopolar electrical stimulation and bipolar electrical stimulation (one intracochlear stimulating contact and a second intracochlear return contact) have shown mixed results. The majority of studies have shown more broadly distributed neuronal activation for monopolar than for bipolar intracochlear stimulation, including studies in the auditory nerve (van den Honert and Stypulkowski 1987;Kral et al 1998), inferior colliculus (Merzenich and White 1977;Snyder et al 1990Snyder et al , 2004Snyder et al , 2008Middlebrooks and Snyder 2007), and auditory cortex (Bierer and Middlebrooks 2002); but a few studies have shown similar neuronal activation patterns for monopolar and bipolar stimulation at low to moderate stimulus intensities (Liang et al 1999;Rebscher et al 2001;Smith and Delgutte 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%