Proceedings. International Test Conference 1990
DOI: 10.1109/test.1990.114098
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single-fault fault collapsing analysis in sequential logic circuits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A fault is a potentially detectable fault (PDF) if the fault is sequentially undetectable and, for every DFF, starting at the X state, there is an input sequence that produces a combination of the good and faulty output responses O/X or 1/X at some primary outputs [20]. From the previous discussion, the fault effect of the Case 1 fault on the propagation path is either O/X or 1/X which can not be considered to be detected when it propagates to the primary output.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A fault is a potentially detectable fault (PDF) if the fault is sequentially undetectable and, for every DFF, starting at the X state, there is an input sequence that produces a combination of the good and faulty output responses O/X or 1/X at some primary outputs [20]. From the previous discussion, the fault effect of the Case 1 fault on the propagation path is either O/X or 1/X which can not be considered to be detected when it propagates to the primary output.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Case 2: This case is caused by the sequential self-masking effect [20]. The circuit in Figure 4 is used to demonstrate this.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the latter case, all single stuck-at faults on gate inputs and outputs are injected and g-equivalent [28] faults are collapsed. An optional random ATPG phase is also We applied our method on three asynchronous pipelines.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The approach of [13] is based on formal methods and assumes a fault-free reset state. Fault collapsing in sequential circuits is addressed in [14,15]. Checkpoint faults that need to be considered for testing are identified in [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Checkpoint faults that need to be considered for testing are identified in [14]. The method in [15] uses equivalence and dominance relations for performing fault collapsing on a restricted set of fault pairs. Only input-output faults of a single gate or flip-flop and branch-stem faults at fanout points are targeted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%