2020
DOI: 10.1109/tit.2020.3006228
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single-Error Detection and Correction for Duplication and Substitution Channels

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, if the total number of duplications is limited, restricting codewords to irreducible sequences will be inefficient, although a combination of irreducible sequences and codes in the 1 -metric have been found to be of use in the related problem of correcting only exact duplications [7]. Another possible direction is the use of constrained codes, similar to [16], to decrease the variety of the error types that may be encountered, thereby simplifying code construction. We note however that such an approach will likely incur a rate penalty.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, if the total number of duplications is limited, restricting codewords to irreducible sequences will be inefficient, although a combination of irreducible sequences and codes in the 1 -metric have been found to be of use in the related problem of correcting only exact duplications [7]. Another possible direction is the use of constrained codes, similar to [16], to decrease the variety of the error types that may be encountered, thereby simplifying code construction. We note however that such an approach will likely incur a rate penalty.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally both codes have the same asymptotic rate (given in (1) for large k), and in this sense the code proposed here is asymptotically optimal, although it is not clear whether (2k + 4) log q n is the best possible redundancy. For the alphabet size q ∈ {3, 4, 5} and the duplication length k = 3, Figure 2 shows the lower bound of the code rate as the length n of codewords ranges from 100 to 400, based on (34), (16) and [5].…”
Section: Error-correcting Codes For Noisy Duplication Channelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fix some string-duplication system S = S(Σ, s, T ). Depending on the application, one can view S in two ways: either as a generative model which describes what possible strings may be derived from s (e.g., see [2], [6], [9], [12], [15], [25]), or as a channel which describes what corrupted versions of the transmitted s may be received (e.g., see [16]- [18], [20], [32], [34], [38]- [40]). While the latter view calls for the construction of suitably tailored error-correcting codes, the former inspires the following properties of S to be studied.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other codes that correct a prescribed number of duplications were constructed in [17], [18], [20], [40], addressing several duplication types. Additional codes that are capable of correcting a mixture of tandem duplications and substitutions or edits were described in [32]- [34]. Finally, some Levenshtein-reconstruction problems for duplications were studied in [38], [39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lenz et al [30] provided a construction for codes that can correct one PD error. In [31], codes were given which can correct a combination of TD errors of fixed length k and at most one substitution error. Constructing codes which can correct multiple PD errors or a combination of TD and PD errors remains an open problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%