2014
DOI: 10.1007/s00213-014-3797-6
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single dose propranolol does not affect physiologic or emotional reactivity to smoking cues

Abstract: Background Smoking cue exposure reactivates salient smoking-related memories, triggering craving to smoke, a phenomenon associated with maintenance of smoking behavior and relapse after periods of abstinence. Acute β-adrenergic blockade with propranolol reduces physiologic reactivity during subsequent recollection of traumatic events by inhibiting reconsolidation of reactivated memories in a process called memory reconsolidation blockade. Objective To determine whether a single dose of propranolol prior to r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
53
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
1
53
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to the original hypothesis, post-reactivation propranolol had no effect on cue-induced reinstatement, indicative of no effect on It is not surprising, however, that propranolol failed to block reconsolidation as measured by cue-induced reinstatement. Previous research indicates that propranolol is not always effective at interfering with reconsolidation in both rodents Font and Cunningham 2012;Milton et al 2012;Williams and Harding 2014) and humans (Tollenaar et al 2009;Bos et al 2014;Pachas et al 2015;Spring et al 2015;Wood et al 2015), and replications of experiments even within the same laboratory have produced differing results (Kindt et al 2009;Bos et al 2014). Some explanations for these inconsistencies include the ability of propranolol to preferentially affect emotional memories over neutral memories (Schwabe et al 2012a,b), individual differences in participants (Soeter and Kindt 2013), and the mnemonic paradigm under investigation Wei and Li 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In contrast to the original hypothesis, post-reactivation propranolol had no effect on cue-induced reinstatement, indicative of no effect on It is not surprising, however, that propranolol failed to block reconsolidation as measured by cue-induced reinstatement. Previous research indicates that propranolol is not always effective at interfering with reconsolidation in both rodents Font and Cunningham 2012;Milton et al 2012;Williams and Harding 2014) and humans (Tollenaar et al 2009;Bos et al 2014;Pachas et al 2015;Spring et al 2015;Wood et al 2015), and replications of experiments even within the same laboratory have produced differing results (Kindt et al 2009;Bos et al 2014). Some explanations for these inconsistencies include the ability of propranolol to preferentially affect emotional memories over neutral memories (Schwabe et al 2012a,b), individual differences in participants (Soeter and Kindt 2013), and the mnemonic paradigm under investigation Wei and Li 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…However, as mentioned in the introductory paragraphs, with few exceptions (15,16), the translation of these preclinical studies to human addicts has not been successful (1921). This state of affairs, and the realization that a major limitation of CS-induced retrieval and reconsolidation procedures is that the neuropharmacological manipulations interfere only with reconsolidation of memories selectively associated with the reactivated CS without affecting memories associated with other CSs or the UCS itself (2527), inspired us to develop alternative memory reconsolidation interference procedures where the drug reward memory is reactivated by exposure to the drug itself (the UCS).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, with few exceptions (15,16), the translation of these preclinical studies has not been successful. For example, the β-adrenoceptor blocker propranolol, which interferes with CS-induced retrieval and reconsolidation of drug reward memories in animal models (13,14,17,18), was ineffective in translational studies with human drug users (1921). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, memory reactivation makes specific drug memory vulnerable to selective and safe blockade by drug treatment (Milton and Everitt 2010). The potential application of such as strategy has also been proposed for smoking cessation and tested for inhibition by pharmacological intervention in humans (Pachas et al 2015) and with post-reactivation extinction in animals with conflicting findings.…”
Section: Future Developments: Targeting Nicotine and Tobacco 'Appetitmentioning
confidence: 99%