2018
DOI: 10.1097/scs.0000000000004592
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single-Center Surgical Experience of the Treatment of Craniopharyngiomas With Emphasis on the Operative Approach: Endoscopic Endonasal and Open Microscopic Transcranial Approaches

Abstract: This study aimed to report the authors' single-center clinical experience about craniopharyngiomas and discuss surgical outcomes of these patients according to the type of surgical approach (endoscopic endonasal or open microscopic transcranial approach).Twenty-four patients diagnosed with craniopharyngiomas between May 2013 and April 2017 were considered for inclusion. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to the surgical approach (open transcranial microscopic approach [group A] and endoscopic en… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this makes no sense in such small group sizes. Nevertheless, craniopharyngiomas are a rather rare disease and most series have a magnitude of size like we present in our study [7,22,25,33]. A solution for this problem would be a large multicenter study, as was done by Little et al with regard to the comparison of endoscopic versus microsurgical endonasal approaches to pituitary lesions [18].…”
Section: Limitations Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, this makes no sense in such small group sizes. Nevertheless, craniopharyngiomas are a rather rare disease and most series have a magnitude of size like we present in our study [7,22,25,33]. A solution for this problem would be a large multicenter study, as was done by Little et al with regard to the comparison of endoscopic versus microsurgical endonasal approaches to pituitary lesions [18].…”
Section: Limitations Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 75%
“…All axes in this group experienced a significant deterioration, whereas in the endonasal resection group the differences reached only in part statistical significance. Most studies are not addressing the single anterior pituitary lobe hormone axes, but rather make statements like “total” or “partial” anterior pituitary lobe deficiency [ 14 , 16 , 22 , 25 , 33 ]. Thus, their results are not comparable to our single-axis analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the history of surgical treatment for CPs has been spanned the course of more than 100 years, these masses still pose a surgical challenge even after the application of modern neurosurgical techniques ( 18 22 ). Numerous studies have revealed that quality of life (QoL) and cognitive performance are frequently impaired in long-term survivors after surgery due to the anatomical proximity of the CPs to the optic nerve and to the hypothalamic-pituitary axes ( 23 25 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Endoscopic transphenoidal surgery is one of those less invasive surgical techniques that allow patients with sellar tumors, especially the pituitary tumor, to recover and return to their daily life faster when comparing to conventional open craniotomy surgery. [ 4 5 6 ] Nevertheless, the endoscopic transphenoidal surgery to remove pituitary tumor may result in the higher chance of complications from pituitary hormone disorders because of pituitary gland and stalk manipulation during the operation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%