2014
DOI: 10.3171/2014.7.jns132237
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single-center experience with a dual microcatheter technique for the endovascular treatment of wide-necked aneurysms

Abstract: Object. The endovascular treatment of wide-necked aneurysms can be technically challenging due to distal coil migration or impingement of the parent vessel. In this paper, the authors illustrate an alternative method for the treatment of wide-necked intracranial aneurysms using a dual microcatheter technique.Methods. The authors' first 100 consecutive patients who underwent coil embolization of a wide-necked aneurysm using a dual microcatheter technique are reported. With this technique, 2 microcatheters are u… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

3
33
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(51 reference statements)
3
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1,[18][19][20][21] The multicatheter technique also ranged from 0% to 13.3%. 5,13,22,23 Notably, in our series, treatment-related morbidity occurred in only 1 patient (1.6%), which is acceptable in comparison with the reported results from the literature focusing only on wide necks and is also remarkable because adding an adjunctive device may lead to an increase in adverse events like thromboembolism and intraprocedural rupture. 24,25 Another concern is a possible increase in the recanalization rate after frequent incomplete coiling due to the complicated characteristics of the aneurysm.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…1,[18][19][20][21] The multicatheter technique also ranged from 0% to 13.3%. 5,13,22,23 Notably, in our series, treatment-related morbidity occurred in only 1 patient (1.6%), which is acceptable in comparison with the reported results from the literature focusing only on wide necks and is also remarkable because adding an adjunctive device may lead to an increase in adverse events like thromboembolism and intraprocedural rupture. 24,25 Another concern is a possible increase in the recanalization rate after frequent incomplete coiling due to the complicated characteristics of the aneurysm.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] However, if wide-neck aneurysms have an incorporated branch and/or deeply lobulated sac, coiling is more difficult and there is potentially an increased risk of incomplete coiling, a thromboembolic event, or branching occlusion and posttreatment recurrence. The unique configuration of this aneurysm usually demands a more elaborate coiling technique and can be recognized as a complex and difficult aneurysm in view of the coiling procedure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations