“…While these single‐cell/single‐nuclei RNA sequencing data provide insight into the extent of interneuron diversity, the question of the extent to which these distinct CaBP‐expressing interneurons further diverge into distinct physiological, morphological, and neurochemical subclasses across cortical areas and species remains open (reviews: Li et al., 2020; Lim et al., 2018). One challenge is the fact that mRNA expression patterns revealed in these transcriptomic studies do not fully mirror neurochemical expression at the protein level (e.g., Carlyle et al., 2017; Jha et al., 2022; Parkes & Niranjan, 2019), and do not give insight on the circuit functional properties of interneurons (reviews: Batista‐Brito & Fishell, 2009; Li et al., 2020; Mi et al., 2018). Indeed, recent work in rodents has definitively shown that while interneuron identity is in large part determined by their intrinsic neurochemical and transcript expression profiles, extrinsic factors such as laminar location, connectivity, and activity play a key role in determining the function of distinct interneuron types, and ultimately shaping the cortical inhibitory circuits that underlie behavior (Boldog et al., 2018; Bugeon et al., 2022; Pouchelon et al., 2021).…”