2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.12.03.408542
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single Cell Sequencing Reveals Glial Specific Responses to Tissue Processing & Enzymatic Dissociation in Mice and Humans

Abstract: A key aspect of nearly all single cell experiments is the necessity to dissociate intact tissues into single cell suspensions for processing. While many protocols have been optimized for optimal cell yield, they have often overlooked the effects that dissociation can have on ex vivo gene expression changes during this process. Microglia, the brain’s resident macrophages, are a highly dynamic population that are extremely sensitive to their microenvironment and have been shown to dramatically alter their transc… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
48
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
3
48
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We observed higher levels of cytokine and chemokine transcripts across all Cell-and Sort-TRAP groups when compared to Tissue-TRAP (One-way ANOVA, BHMTC, SNK FDR<0.1, |FC|>2). In an effort to cross-validate our finding with previous studies, we intersected ex vivo microglial activational gene lists from three previous studies (Ayata et al, 2018;Marsh et al, 2020) and identified 21 ex vivo activational transcripts represented in at least two of the studies (Figure 4J; Supplemental Table 5). PCA of the TRAP data from the present study on the 21 ex vivo activational genes shows clear separation of Tissue-TRAP from all other groups in the first component (92.8% explained variance) (Figure 4K).…”
Section: Comparison Of Trap-isolated Microglial Translatome From Tissue Homogenate Cell Suspension and Various Microglial Sort Methodssupporting
confidence: 66%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We observed higher levels of cytokine and chemokine transcripts across all Cell-and Sort-TRAP groups when compared to Tissue-TRAP (One-way ANOVA, BHMTC, SNK FDR<0.1, |FC|>2). In an effort to cross-validate our finding with previous studies, we intersected ex vivo microglial activational gene lists from three previous studies (Ayata et al, 2018;Marsh et al, 2020) and identified 21 ex vivo activational transcripts represented in at least two of the studies (Figure 4J; Supplemental Table 5). PCA of the TRAP data from the present study on the 21 ex vivo activational genes shows clear separation of Tissue-TRAP from all other groups in the first component (92.8% explained variance) (Figure 4K).…”
Section: Comparison Of Trap-isolated Microglial Translatome From Tissue Homogenate Cell Suspension and Various Microglial Sort Methodssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…In recent years, several studies have suggested that cell-isolation methods cause ex vivo activational effects in microglia (Ayata et al, 2018;Marsh et al, 2020). In this section, our goal was to determine if different sorting techniques result in different levels of ex vivo activation.…”
Section: Comparison Of Trap-isolated Microglial Translatome From Tissue Homogenate Cell Suspension and Various Microglial Sort Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Cluster annotation was performed manually on the basis of the expression of canonical markers. Cells not of interest to the analysis were removed on the basis of these cluster annotations, including oligodendrocytes, ependymal cells, choroid plexus endothelial cells, a small population of pericytes and smooth muscle cells, and a subcluster of microglia with a similar gene signature to artificially ex vivo activated microglia (59). Transcripts were then rescaled, reclustered, and annotated again using the methods described above, and clusters were collapsed on the basis of common cell types.…”
Section: Murine Single-cell Rna-seqmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many of these genes can be upregulated upon neuronal activation, but also upon stress and apoptosis (Hrvatin et al, 2018). However, stress and apoptosis can be induced by the processing of tissue in single cell transcriptomic approaches (Brink et al, 2017; Marsh et al, 2020). Thus, it is challenging to determine whether stress/activated related signatures are truly biological or artefactual.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%