2022
DOI: 10.3390/ijms23094497
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single-Cell RNA Sequencing for Plant Research: Insights and Possible Benefits

Abstract: In recent years, advances in single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) technologies have continued to change our views on biological systems by increasing the spatiotemporal resolution of our analysis to single-cell resolution. Application of scRNA-seq to plants enables the comprehensive characterization of both common and rare cell types and cell states, uncovering new cell types and revealing how cell types relate to each other spatially and developmentally. This review provides an overview of scRNA-seq methodo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
3

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
0
17
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The scRNA‐seq workflow includes dissociation of target cells from the tissue, cell isolation, RNA extraction, cDNA synthesis by reverse transcription, and single‐cell sequencing, followed by bioinformatics analyses, including expression matrix construction, cell type identification, and cell cluster annotation (Bawa et al., 2022). Early attempts to increase the spatiotemporal solution with techniques such as laser capture microdissection (LCM) (Asano et al., 2002; Cai & Lashbrook, 2006; Tomlins et al., 2007), capturing cells with fluorescence‐activated cell sorting (FACS) (Birnbaum et al., 2003; Brady et al., 2007), or isolation of nuclei tagged in individual cell types (INTACT) (Deal & Henikoff, 2011) could only analyze hundreds of cells at very high resolution.…”
Section: Single‐cell Transcriptomicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scRNA‐seq workflow includes dissociation of target cells from the tissue, cell isolation, RNA extraction, cDNA synthesis by reverse transcription, and single‐cell sequencing, followed by bioinformatics analyses, including expression matrix construction, cell type identification, and cell cluster annotation (Bawa et al., 2022). Early attempts to increase the spatiotemporal solution with techniques such as laser capture microdissection (LCM) (Asano et al., 2002; Cai & Lashbrook, 2006; Tomlins et al., 2007), capturing cells with fluorescence‐activated cell sorting (FACS) (Birnbaum et al., 2003; Brady et al., 2007), or isolation of nuclei tagged in individual cell types (INTACT) (Deal & Henikoff, 2011) could only analyze hundreds of cells at very high resolution.…”
Section: Single‐cell Transcriptomicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first scRNA-seq atlas was accomplished in Arabidopsis roots, demonstrating the viability of this technology in plants ( Ryu et al., 2019 ). The single cell transcriptome technique can actually characterize common cell types and cell states, uncover rare cell types, and reveal, in particular, the relationship between cell differentiation and development among various cell types ( Bawa et al., 2022 ). Since its invention, the single cell suspension technique has been used to study the genetics of maize, the regulation of tomato root initiation, and the differentiation trajectory of peanut leaf ( Nelms and Walbot, 2019 ; Liu et al., 2021a ; Xu et al., 2021 ; Omary et al., 2022 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent years have witnessed a major increase in the application of single‐cell RNA‐sequencing (scRNA‐seq) technology in plant research (Bawa et al., 2022; Giacomello, 2021; Luo et al., 2020; Mironova & Xu, 2019; Rich‐Griffin et al., 2020; Rodriguez‐Villalon & Brady, 2019; Ryu et al., 2021). However, the majority of current research has focused on plant roots (Graeff et al., 2021;Serrano‐Ron et al., 2021; Wendrich et al., 2020; Zhang, Xu, et al., 2019) as a result of the availability of improved root cell protoplast preparation protocols, a better understanding of root cell types, and the presence of representative marker genes (Serrano‐Ron et al., 2021; Wendrich et al., 2020; Zhang, Xu, et al., 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%