2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11307-017-1144-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single-Cell Imaging Using Radioluminescence Microscopy Reveals Unexpected Binding Target for [18F]HFB

Abstract: Purpose Cell-based therapies are showing great promise for a variety of diseases, but remain hindered by the limited information available regarding the biological fate, migration routes and differentiation patterns of infused cells in trials. Previous studies have demonstrated the feasibility of using positron emission tomography (PET) to track single cells utilising an approach known as positron emission particle tracking (PEPT). The radiolabel hexadecyl-4-[18F] fluorobenzoate ([18F]HFB) was identified as a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(53 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mechanisms behind the difference in retention between the cell surface labeling agents [ 18 F]­HFB/[ 124 I]­HIB and [ 18 F]­SFB were not explored, but it is possible than protein-rich areas of the membrane (to which [ 18 F]­SFB is more likely to bind) are more frequently recycled or that surface protein-bound radiolabels are cleaved by extracellular proteases. [ 18 F]­HFB was found to preferentially bind to disrupted membrane fragments on dead cells over live intact cells . This could be a potential drawback for in vivo cell tracking with this agent, as dead cells can have different biodistribution profiles compared to live cells, leading to misinterpretation of the images .…”
Section: Chemical Probes For Ex Vivo Direct Cell Radiolabelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mechanisms behind the difference in retention between the cell surface labeling agents [ 18 F]­HFB/[ 124 I]­HIB and [ 18 F]­SFB were not explored, but it is possible than protein-rich areas of the membrane (to which [ 18 F]­SFB is more likely to bind) are more frequently recycled or that surface protein-bound radiolabels are cleaved by extracellular proteases. [ 18 F]­HFB was found to preferentially bind to disrupted membrane fragments on dead cells over live intact cells . This could be a potential drawback for in vivo cell tracking with this agent, as dead cells can have different biodistribution profiles compared to live cells, leading to misinterpretation of the images .…”
Section: Chemical Probes For Ex Vivo Direct Cell Radiolabelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In conclusion, we have developed a method to fabricate and characterize thin-film scintillator dishes for radioluminescence microscopy. Radioluminescence microscopy is an important technique that has already been used for microscopy applications beyond FDG imaging; radioluminescence has shed light on the localization characteristics of hexadecyl-4-[ 18 F]fluorobenzoate ([ 18 F]HFB) 19 as well as the distribution pattern of 3'-deoxy-3'-[ 18 F]fluorothymidine ( 18 F-FLT) in proliferative vs. non-proliferative cells 3 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously, we developed radioluminescence microscopy (RLM) as a new method to image radiotracer uptake in a microscopic environment. RLM allows researchers to quantitatively image the transport kinetics of radioactive molecules with single-cell resolution and also perform fluorescence microscopy using the same platform. , The modality has been used to evaluate novel molecular imaging probes , and investigate the biological response of clinical PET tracers. , A comprehensive literature review by Liu and Lan summarizes the specific advantages of RLM and other radionuclide bioassays …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%