2019
DOI: 10.1101/784801
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single-cell genomics of uncultured bacteria reveals dietary fiber responders in the mouse gut microbiota

Abstract: BackgroundThe gut microbiota can have dramatic effects on host metabolism; however, current genomic strategies for uncultured bacteria have several limitations that hinder their ability to identify responders to metabolic changes in the microbiota. In this study, we describe a novel singlecell genomic sequencing technique that can identify metabolic responders at the species level without the need for reference genomes, and apply this method to identify bacterial responders to an inulin-based diet in the mouse… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(68 reference statements)
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the number of constructed genomes was limited, and no tool has been developed to comprehensively obtain multispecies genomes at once, which is mostly due to the lack of technology that provides good quality SAGs as binning guides. In SIGMA, the qualities of SAGs obtained by our SAG-gel technology 22 were sufficiently high to prevent false-positive contigs in supervised contig identification. In addition, merging of SAGs with the metagenomic bin aided recovery of rRNA and tRNA sequences, which were frequently lacking in the MAGs obtained by conventional binners.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, the number of constructed genomes was limited, and no tool has been developed to comprehensively obtain multispecies genomes at once, which is mostly due to the lack of technology that provides good quality SAGs as binning guides. In SIGMA, the qualities of SAGs obtained by our SAG-gel technology 22 were sufficiently high to prevent false-positive contigs in supervised contig identification. In addition, merging of SAGs with the metagenomic bin aided recovery of rRNA and tRNA sequences, which were frequently lacking in the MAGs obtained by conventional binners.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Single-cell genome sequencing was performed with single-cell whole genome amplification (WGA) using the SAG-gel platform according to our previous reports 22,26 . Following homogenization of human feces in GuSCN solution (500 μL), the supernatant was recovered by centrifugation at 2000 × g for 30 s, followed by filtration through 35-μm nylon mesh and centrifugation at 8,000 × g for 5 min.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, unlike the genomes of isolates, challenges in genome assembly are not fully resolved using SAG-gel platform alone, as WGA process generates numerous chimeric reads 32 , hampering the assembly of long contiguous sequences and randomly biased amplified genomes 11 , and causing incomplete genome coverage. By combining our methods with other tools including cleaning and co-assembly of SAGs from the same species, the number of chimeric contigs and genome incompleteness could be significantly reduced 26,33 . Draft genomes acquired by SAG-gel can also be combined with other sequence data sets including shotgun metagenome sequencing and long-read sequencing, all of which will promote genome finishing 34 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By contrast, high-quality strainresolved genomes of taxa from the human gut microbiome have been assembled from colonies cultured from individual microbes (Almeida et al, 2019;Browne et al, 2016;Poyet et al, 2019;Zhao et al, 2019); however, culturing colonies can be labor-intensive and biased toward easy-to-culture microbes. Alternatively, single-cell genomics relies upon isolating and lysing individual microbes in wells on a titer plate, and subsequently amplifying their DNA for sequencing (Chijiiwa et al, 2020;Lasken, 2007;Pachiadaki et al, 2019;Rinke et al, 2014;Xu et al, 2016); such approaches also yield strain-resolved genomes and have been used to probe the association between phages (Džunková et al, 2019) and bacteria in the human gut microbiome. For both culture and well-plate approaches, however, available resources severely limit the number of strain-resolved genomes that originate from the same community (Almeida et al, 2019;Poyet et al, 2019), thereby constraining our knowledge of the genomic structure and dynamics of the human gut microbiome of an individual.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%