2001
DOI: 10.1093/jexbot/52.356.605
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single‐cell dissection and microdroplet chemistry

Abstract: The unique roles of individual cells may be critical to the physiology of an organism. In such cases, micromethods are essential to elucidating the molecular biology, biochemistry and biophysics of the specialized cells or even subcellular compartments of the important cells. The great proliferation of micromethods testifies to their value and no single review can be comprehensive. This review therefore provides only a generalized overview of one approach, namely dissection that provides a pure sample for subs… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several general approaches have been employed to focus this to cellular and even sub-cellular resolution (Kehr 2001). These include in situ hybridization (McFadden 1994), elegant hand-dissection (Outlaw and Zhang 2001), and advanced laser-capture micro-dissection (Simone et al 1998). Promoter-reporter expression systems (for reviews, see Guivarch et al 1996;Hanson and Ko¨hler 2001), although popular, have certain drawbacks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several general approaches have been employed to focus this to cellular and even sub-cellular resolution (Kehr 2001). These include in situ hybridization (McFadden 1994), elegant hand-dissection (Outlaw and Zhang 2001), and advanced laser-capture micro-dissection (Simone et al 1998). Promoter-reporter expression systems (for reviews, see Guivarch et al 1996;Hanson and Ko¨hler 2001), although popular, have certain drawbacks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter approach is usually limited to use in Arabidopsis and rice and maize plants, which are amenable to transformation and are easily handled in large quantities (Evrard et al., ; Li & Arumuganathan, ; Li, Arumuganathan, Gill, & Song, ). Some techniques applied to animal tissue, including sectioning of frozen tissue blocks to select for specific cell populations, irradiation of stained sections to destroy unwanted cells, and microdissection with manual tools such as sharp needles (Emmert‐Buck et al., ; Outlaw & Zhang, ; Schrader et al., ), are not applicable to plant tissue. Further, plant tissue and cells present specific challenges in comparison to animal tissue due to the presence of plant cell walls, vacuoles, chloroplasts, and secondary metabolites, making LCM a better choice (Cosgrove, ; Giannella et al.…”
Section: Commentarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, ; Jones et al . ; Outlaw & Lowry ; Shen & Outlaw ; Outlaw & Zhang ). Despite this, comparisons of the photosynthetic cell types (mesophyll and guard cells) with their non‐photosynthetic counterparts (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%