Single-Cell Analysis Uncovers Extensive Biological Noise in Poliovirus Replication

Abstract

Viral infections often begin with a very small number of initiating particles. Accordingly, the outcome of an infection is likely to be affected by variability in the initial molecular interactions between virus and host. In this study, we investigated the range of outcomes upon infection of single cells. We isolated individual cells infected with poliovirus at low or high multiplicities of infection (MOI) and measured viral genomic replication and infectious viral progeny in each cell. We first determined that at 7 h postinfection, the ratio of positive to negative strands in individual cells varies from 5:1 to more than 190:1, with and average of 20:1, suggesting a significant variability in RNA synthesis. We further found that while virus genome production is higher in cells infected at a high multiplicity, the production of infectious particles is largely independent of the number of viruses infecting each cell. Strikingly, by correlating RNA and particle production within individual infections, we uncovered a significant contribution of stochastic noise to the outcome of infection. At low MOI, stochastic influences appear as kinetic effects which are most critical at the initial steps in infection. At high MOI, stochastic influences appear to dictate the virus's ability to harness cellular resources. We conclude that biological noise is a critical determinant of the overall productivity of viral infections. The distinct nature of stochasticity in the outcome of infection by low and high numbers of viral particles may have important implications for our understanding of the determinants of successful viral infections. IMPORTANCEBy correlating genome and particle production in single-cell infections, we elucidated sources of noise in viral infections. When a cell was infected by only a single infectious particle, variation in the kinetics of the initial steps of replication contributed significantly to the overall productivity of the infection. Additionally, variation in the distribution of subcellular resources impacted infections initiated by one or many infectious particles. We also observed that when a cell was infected with multiple particles, more genomes were produced, while particle production was hindered by an apparent cellular resource limit. Understanding variations in viral infections may illuminate the dynamics of infection and pathogenesis and has implications for virus adaptation and evolution.

Differential Reovirus-Specific and Herpesvirus-Specific Activator Protein 1 Activation of Secretogranin II Leads to Altered Virus Secretion

“…2B, green arrows) also did not show an obvious increase in SCG2 expression, suggesting that SCG2 upregulation may be cell specific. Cellspecific differential responses and virus production were observed previously in populations of cultured cells (i.e., see references [22][23][24]. Importantly, we did not observe any noninfected cells in which the SCG2 expression level was significantly higher than that in the mock-infected cultures.…”

Limits of variation, specific infectivity, and genome packaging of massively recoded poliovirus genomes

“…We suggest that the success of one virion over all other virions incubated on a huge excess of host cells is a stochastic process. This conclusion was also reached recently by two other groups (65,66). Since PV is haploid, studies of si present the infection of a single cell with a single genotype, notwithstanding the fact that PV is a quasispecies that will form genetic variants later during its replicative cycle.…”

Cellular cap-binding protein, eIF4E, promotes picornavirus genome restructuring and translation

“…Interestingly, the production of infectious PV particles in single cells is very heterogeneous and generally independent of the number of viruses used in the infection (31). The precise molecular basis for this heterogeneity is not clear, but it is entirely possible that variation in eIF4E availability between cells could contribute to this phenomenon through its positive and negative effects on PV translation.…”