2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2020.09.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single case analyses of two overlap sequences in casual ELF conversations from a multimodal perspective: Toward the consideration of mutual benefits of ELF and CA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To summarize, 85% of groups contain irregular selfselections, and 60% of groups are active in implementing such actions to participate in the conversation. The results are in line with the evidence that EFL learners are interactionally competent members to participate in a conversation (see Carroll, 2004;Firth and Wagner, 2007;Lee, 2017;Konakahara, 2020). For example, Lee (2017) found that learners actively interrupted the ongoing talk to move into the primary speaker position.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…To summarize, 85% of groups contain irregular selfselections, and 60% of groups are active in implementing such actions to participate in the conversation. The results are in line with the evidence that EFL learners are interactionally competent members to participate in a conversation (see Carroll, 2004;Firth and Wagner, 2007;Lee, 2017;Konakahara, 2020). For example, Lee (2017) found that learners actively interrupted the ongoing talk to move into the primary speaker position.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Moreover, without clinging to the overlap, participants cooperatively moved the talk forward. Konakahara (2020) further reported two kinds of irregular self-selections (i.e., floor-taking overlap and floor-attempting overlap) from when and how, but this study did not consider why. Lee (2017) investigated how learners used touch to interrupt the ongoing talk to join the multi-party interaction.…”
Section: Irregular Self-selection: When How and Whymentioning
confidence: 84%
See 3 more Smart Citations