2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.scib.2023.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single atomic Ru in TiO2 boost efficient electrocatalytic water oxidation to hydrogen peroxide

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, it has been reported that several TiO 2 -based single-atom catalysts enable the production of H 2 O 2 . 60,61 Thus, these results collectively suggest that the oxidation products have negligible influence on Ag/TiO 2 , further ensuring its good stability. Recurrence experiments over Ag/TiO 2 (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…In particular, it has been reported that several TiO 2 -based single-atom catalysts enable the production of H 2 O 2 . 60,61 Thus, these results collectively suggest that the oxidation products have negligible influence on Ag/TiO 2 , further ensuring its good stability. Recurrence experiments over Ag/TiO 2 (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…These three samples’ high-resolution C 1s spectra (Figure b) exhibit four prominent peaks accordingly signifying CC, C–OH, C–O–C, and HO–CO bonds. Meanwhile, Figure b also shows that the Ru 3d and C 1s signals overlapped, and the fitted Ru 3d signal is divided into the Ru 3d 3/2 and Ru 3d 5/2 peaks for Ru SA/GFs (285.20 and 281.70 eV) and Ru NPs/GFs (285.10 and 281.60 eV), respectively. , In the O 1s spectra (Figure c), aside from the existence of O–H and C–O bonds in three of them, , the emergence of the peak around 530.20 eV corresponding to Ru–O appeared in both Ru SA/GFs and Ru NP/GFs, while the peak located about 533.33 eV attributed to HO–CO observed in GFs diminishes. This alteration suggests that the Ru species anchored on the GFs through chemical bonding. , Furthermore, the signal of Na in GFs is relatively strong, whereas the Na signal decreases after the deposition of Ru (Figure S3), suggesting that the Na element probably indeed exerts a pronounced influence on the formation of the Ru single atom …”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…To ascertain the atomic dispersion of Ru on the Ru SA/GFs, a more thorough examination of Ru SA/GFs was conducted using spherical aberration-corrected high-angle annular dark-field scanning transmission electron microscopy (AC-HAADF-STEM). As depicted in Figure 1e,f, the conspicuously white dots were 31,32 In the O 1s spectra (Figure 2c), aside from the existence of O−H and C−O bonds in three of them, 33,34 the emergence of the peak around 530.20 eV corresponding to Ru−O appeared in both Ru SA/GFs and Ru NP/GFs, 35 while the peak located about 533.33 eV attributed to HO−C�O observed in GFs diminishes. This alteration suggests that the Ru species anchored on the GFs through chemical bonding.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Sun et al prepared a novel Ru 0.08 Ti 0.92 O 2 catalyst by controllably introducing Ru atoms into TiO 2 (Figure 9a). [286] HAADF-STEM analysis showed the Ru species dispersed as isolated single atoms on the Ru 0.08 Ti 0.92 O 2 surface(Figure 9b). XANES spectra analysis showed that Ru was in the +3-oxidation state and the valence state of Ti was decreased by the introduction of Ru 3+ (Figure 9c,d).…”
Section: Sascs Designation For Wormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…f) The calculated volcano plot of Ru x Ti 1-x O 2 . g) Adsorption free energy for *OH and *O on Ru 0.10 Ti 0.90 O 2 and Ru 0.08 Ti 0.92 O 2 .Reproduced with permission [286]. Copyright 2023, Elsevier B. V. h) Top and side views of SnO 2 -supported SASCs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%