2017
DOI: 10.1063/1.5003304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single atom imaging with an sCMOS camera

Abstract: Single atom imaging requires discrimination of weak photon count events above background and has typically been performed using either EMCCD cameras, photomultiplier tubes or single photon counting modules. sCMOS provides a cost effective and highly scalable alternative to other single atom imaging technologies, offering fast readout and larger sensor dimensions. We demonstrate single atom resolved imaging of two siteaddressable optical traps separated by 10 µm using an sCMOS camera, offering a competitive sig… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The quantity P b→d is important because it sets an upper bound on the size of the atom array that can be filled without defects (N max ≈ 1/P b→d ), since atoms must survive the initial image (additional contributions arise from the rearrangement process itself [12,14]). Our value, P b→d = 4.5(3) × 10 −3 (N max ≈ 220), is comparable to the lowest directly measured quantity reported in the literature, despite our use of a narrow transition for imaging (previously, values around 0.006-0.01 have been reported [12,37]). Two factors may contribute to this surprising result.…”
supporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The quantity P b→d is important because it sets an upper bound on the size of the atom array that can be filled without defects (N max ≈ 1/P b→d ), since atoms must survive the initial image (additional contributions arise from the rearrangement process itself [12,14]). Our value, P b→d = 4.5(3) × 10 −3 (N max ≈ 220), is comparable to the lowest directly measured quantity reported in the literature, despite our use of a narrow transition for imaging (previously, values around 0.006-0.01 have been reported [12,37]). Two factors may contribute to this surprising result.…”
supporting
confidence: 80%
“…First, the intrinsic low Doppler temperature allows imaging close to saturation, so the count rates we observe are only a factor of 2-4 lower than those obtained with polarization gradient cooling in Rb in similar traps [12]. Second, our sCMOS camera is nearly shot-noise limited even for small photon numbers, and should theoretically have lower noise than an EMCCD when the photon number per pixel is greater than ≈ 5 [37].…”
mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Recently sCMOS cameras have also been investigated [38]. Single-pixel SPADs have the advantage of true photon counting and nanosecond time resolution, making them useful for experiments in quantum optics, but are difficult to scale to large numbers of traps.…”
Section: Avalanche Photodiode Array Detectormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measured quantum efficiency at 461 nm is 36(2)% and the signal-to-noise ratio is 1.9 at 461 nm (for 10 incident photons per pixel). Compared to CCD or sCMOS technology (see [38] for a useful comparison), the SPAD array detector has the edge for short exposures and low numbers of detected photons, where EMCCD and sCMOS cameras are limited by readout noise. However, as the exposure time (and number of photons) increases, the higher quantum efficiency and lower dark count rate of EMCCD and sCMOS cameras ultimately wins out.…”
Section: Avalanche Photodiode Array Detectormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the requirements on the spatial resolution can be relaxed, the atoms can be imaged based on few fluorescence photons [17][18][19]. As a consequence, cooling of the atoms is not required, the spin information can become directly accessible, and, under certain conditions, even * bergschneider@physi.uni-heidelberg.de;;…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%