2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.cscm.2023.e01908
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single and repetitive low-velocity impact responses of sandwich composite structures with different skin and core considerations: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 197 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Generally, re-entrant cores were mentioned in the literature as part of the auxetic structures (Bohara et al , 2023; Chordiya et al , 2022; Kueh et al , 2023; Makweche and Dundu, 2022; Nur Ainin et al , 2023; Patekar and Kale, 2022; Xue et al , 2023). The main reviewed aspects of sandwich cores were core design, mechanical properties, manufacturing methods, impact response, blast response and the applications of such structures.…”
Section: Structural Design Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, re-entrant cores were mentioned in the literature as part of the auxetic structures (Bohara et al , 2023; Chordiya et al , 2022; Kueh et al , 2023; Makweche and Dundu, 2022; Nur Ainin et al , 2023; Patekar and Kale, 2022; Xue et al , 2023). The main reviewed aspects of sandwich cores were core design, mechanical properties, manufacturing methods, impact response, blast response and the applications of such structures.…”
Section: Structural Design Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This category of damage is known as barely visible impact damage. It is more threatening under low-velocity impacts than high-velocity impacts since their damage invisibility can easily be overlooked [ 8 , 9 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been shown that the accumulation of damage due to repeated impacts, even at low energy levels, could result in damaged regions that deteriorate the mechanical properties of the material 19,20 . In addition, experimental evidence suggested that repeated impacts at the same location with low energy may cause more severe damage than a single high‐energy impact 21‐23 . For example, Tian and Zhou 24 investigated the mechanical response of glass fiber‐reinforced aluminum alloy laminates under single and multiple impacts with the same total energy (30 J, 20 J + 10 J, 10 J + 20 J, 10 J + 10 J + 10 J), and the results showed that the multiple impact mode of 10 J + 10 J + 10 J caused maximum permanent deformation of the laminates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19,20 In addition, experimental evidence suggested that repeated impacts at the same location with low energy may cause more severe damage than a single high-energy impact. [21][22][23] For example, Tian and Zhou 24 investigated the mechanical response of glass fiber-reinforced aluminum alloy laminates under single and multiple impacts with the same total energy (30 J, 20 J + 10 J, 10 J + 20 J, 10 J + 10 J + 10 J), and the results showed that the multiple impact mode of 10 J + 10 J + 10 J caused maximum permanent deformation of the laminates. Katunin et al 24 evaluated the general characteristics of structural degradation of composites under low-velocity repetitive impact loading by means of an image-processing algorithm developed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%